|
|
SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-26-2010, 04:35 PM | #45 |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
@Crimson92, agreed. They should have spent a little more time developing the M Z4.
@r4gs, It is possible to cut some fat from the Z4 as I mentioned on my earlier post. But after the wheels (easly 25lb) and seats (80lbs), it gets harder to loose weight. The hatch is quite heavy, also the exhaust and the battery are good areas to cut weight. But then all these are at the rear of the car, so you're begining to change the weight distribution of the car. I don't know where you can loose weight at the front of the car (empty windshield washer tank?). |
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 04:37 PM | #46 | |
Imola Lover
27
Rep 749
Posts |
Quote:
Brakes from the E46 ///M3 CSL Front Suspension from the E36 ///M3 I wish we could have gotten the E46 ///M3 transmission options!
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 05:09 PM | #47 | |
Captain
33
Rep 606
Posts |
Quote:
That said, I think the take away is that BMW is able to throw the M3, a fairly pedestrian sports car compared to the F430 etc, and compete quite impressively.
__________________
|www.onehotlap.com|Real People|Real Cars|
Last edited by JCz04Bimmer; 08-26-2010 at 05:14 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 05:10 PM | #48 |
1M advocate
214
Rep 878
Posts |
why do people keep thinking a CF roof would drop any significant amount of weight? the roof on a z4 is about 5 sq ft of thin steel, a CF roof would save maybe 5 lbs.
My only complaints with the car are the grinding synchro's and the M's probably should've come standard with aero side skirts... beyond that I really don't have any complaints, the car weighs what it weighs. In today's market it is still one of the lighter cars with similar power, and if you feel the car needs less weight then mod it.
__________________
2012 BMW S1000RR
2011 BMW M3 Last edited by Serious; 08-26-2010 at 05:16 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 05:17 PM | #49 | |
Captain
33
Rep 606
Posts |
Quote:
I would sooner look at the ridiculously overbuilt bulkhead behind our seats. Did someone say Sawzall!?
__________________
|www.onehotlap.com|Real People|Real Cars|
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 06:37 PM | #50 |
Bad Lieutenant
237
Rep 3,517
Posts |
The cf roof is provides a lower center of gravity, I would paint it anyway, not into the way cf looks.
__________________
02 E39M5 | TiAg/Schwartz | Tubi Rumore | Ultimate Ti Pedals | E60 SSK | Coby Alcantara | StrongStrut STB
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 07:08 PM | #51 |
Colonel
192
Rep 2,431
Posts |
I've never seen such an active post on zpost!
And I can't believe no one has mentioned that BMW 's curb weight is a wet weight vs other manufacturers dry weight. There is TONS OF INFO WHERE PEOPLE HAVE WEIGHED IN AT 31** on an Mcoupe. The Mcoupe could have been lighter but the car was a roady since inception, which is also why it is the only vert (other than the boxster) to be lighter than its coupe counterpart. The M roadster is approximately 30+ lbs lighter according to BMWNA.
__________________
F80 m3, 997 gt3, 14 ram ctd, f15 x5, drz400sm Gone:z4m, boss 302, c6 z06, m6,z3m |
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 07:09 PM | #52 | |
1M advocate
214
Rep 878
Posts |
Quote:
Even on the m3 it's an aesthetic feature. It doesn't matter if 18 pounds is 12 feet above the center of gravity in a 3700lb car, it won't make any noticable difference. BTW I did a quick calculation with some rough estimates and if the steel roof was 33lbs (1% of the cars total weight) and a CF was theoretically 0 lbs. It still only lowers the CG of the car about the height of a quarter laying down (~.05-.07").
__________________
2012 BMW S1000RR
2011 BMW M3 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 07:43 PM | #53 |
Dog Listener
712
Rep 7,850
Posts |
Good thread. It's interesting that no matter what car we seem to drive these days there is unanimous agreement cars should weigh less. Compared to the Boxster Spyder yes, this car weighs "too much". The 'Vette is in current form is pretty much the same as the Z4M. Compared to the E9x 3 series this thing is light. Yes, a fatter car with more power will keep up (someone mentioned a 335), but you can't fight the laws of physics, and a heavier car just isn't as nimble as a light car.
The issue comes down to cost and regulation. To really cut back on weight in most cases you've got to use more costly materials (aluminum and/or Carbon Fiber). In some cases, like front fenders, you can go plastic which is cheap. But the fact is that regulations and safetly laws dictate a lot of the weight in cars these days as well--and that's not always a bad thing as we unfortunatelly saw this week with mousitch--this tough little car protected him well. And I'll take a few extra pounds if it means it's going to possibly save my ass. The higher cost material route just puts the car out of a reasonable price range in many instances. That said, would I like to see 200 or 300 pounds off this car? You bet! You can probably cut out 100-200 lbs with mods or decontenting. Things that could cut weight: replace stock seats, TI exhaust (is there one avaiable?), lightweight battery, A/C delete, plastic front fenders (like the E9x M3--but I doubt such a thing exists), JC04's extreme surgery option, lighter wheels, remove stereo and speakers. But the time you're done you'll have pretty much a track-only car that's not going to be much fun for anything else, so that leaves only a few small (and somewhat costly options) unless you want to go all hard-core on the car (which is going to be more costly). |
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 08:32 PM | #54 | |
Private
11
Rep 56
Posts |
Quote:
That being said, I think the Z4M strikes a perfect balance between outright performance and day-to-day drivability. The Lotus is light but that fibre composite body leaves much to be desired, not to mention non-existent NVH and poor build quality (for its price range). Yes, a 200lbs reduction would be very nice and bring the Z4M closer to Boxster/Cayman levels but the Z4M is not a fat car by any means (compared to current offerings). Think the main culprit here is the iron block engine which is a gem and well worth the compromise. I could be wrong but I think the 3.0si weighs approx 100lbs less? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 09:00 PM | #55 |
1M advocate
214
Rep 878
Posts |
The n52 weighs 354lbs. About 120lbs lighter then the s54.
__________________
2012 BMW S1000RR
2011 BMW M3 |
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 09:21 PM | #56 |
Second Lieutenant
16
Rep 232
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 09:36 PM | #57 |
Private First Class
3
Rep 165
Posts |
Exhaust, wheels, and battery changes could get you 150 lbs of relief. In my book that is significant weight loss.
__________________
'06 Z4 ///M Roadster: Silver Gray Metallic; Gray soft top. Zeckhausen CDV. ESS VT1 445 Supercharger. APEX ARC8's. Dunlap Direzza Star Spec's. Strong Struts. Royal Purple. RPI Exhaust w/ DKF hangers.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 10:49 PM | #58 |
Lieutenant Colonel
47
Rep 1,855
Posts |
How much does the stock battery weigh? I've read so much about aftermarket batteries being generally unreliable (unless you charge it every x days/weeks) that I've disregarded it.
__________________
///M Coupe: RPI Scoop, OE Strut, CDV, Volk RE30, SS Brake Lines, Stromung Exhaust |
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 11:02 PM | #59 |
Viper Driver
36
Rep 1,311
Posts |
i'm summarily putting it this way - the m coupe was fashioned by m gmbh engineers, whom i'm sure have a tremendous combined wealth of experience and expertise between them in making the various design directions/decisions culminating in the final product. correspondingly, in my opinion the m coupe is principally targeted towards the discerning enthusiast who wants something unique + classy, something with m-worthy performance + distinction and yet something which is livable on a daily basis.
as much as i do feel the m's would do well with a healthy diet, i'm spoilt for the creature comforts that abound and distinguish this car from the more focused competitors, like a lotus exige (hella lightweight), for example. not to mention upsetting the near perfect weight balance + distribution. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2010, 11:09 PM | #60 |
Captain
33
Rep 606
Posts |
Pics!!
__________________
|www.onehotlap.com|Real People|Real Cars|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-27-2010, 01:04 AM | #62 | |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-27-2010, 01:48 AM | #63 | |
Dog Listener
712
Rep 7,850
Posts |
Quote:
I agree Porsche has kept the weight down, but it's still creeping up over there generation to generation, just not at the pace of other cars. I looked at that about a year ago and noted that while moving more slowly, weight had really gone up. So I just looked again tonight: a 911SC circa 1983 weighed ~2,500 lbs; the 993 weighed in at just over 3,000 pounds, and the 997 S weighed in 3,100 pounds. Safety equipment makes up a lot of that weight, and Porsche does tend to focus on performance not comfort. But the reason Porsche hasn't increased at the same rate as other manufacturers is, as Jeremy Clarkson puts it, "Porsche has the laziest design team in the world". They haven't increased the size of the 911 variants (look at a 911 SC vs. a 997), unlike BMW who keeps going bigger and more bloated. I saw an E34 M5 last weekend at EuroSunday. It was actually smaller than my E92 M3! The E92 is bigger than the E46. At the rate we're going the 3er is going to look like a 7 series soon. You'll need a license to drive a truck for the series of the future. I can hear it now "excuse me sir, you have to put money in two meters for that 7 series since it takes up two parking spaces, so you're getting a parking ticket." So of course these cars weigh more (safety improvements notwithstanding). It's the size of the vehicle BMW is putting out. IMO this reflects the change in people who are growing larger as well, and it's a side effect of the popularity of the land barge sized SUVs which have accutomed the public to having a living room on wheels. The next generation of BMWs will, I'm sure, prove to be even bigger and more bloated than this one. They'll produce more power, but a 4,000 - 4,5000 pound car, no matter how much power and suspension tricks it has, is just not going to be as much fun as a 3,200 pound car due to the laws of physics. And that's what makes the Z4M and Z4 (and Z3s) so special. They're light, nimble, and have just enough "luxury" and comfort to be livable while at the same time delivering great performance. It's why the Z4M is a keeper in my book. Last edited by Finnegan; 08-27-2010 at 01:59 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-27-2010, 07:48 AM | #64 |
Brigadier General
878
Rep 4,092
Posts |
Perhaps you could drop the M's starting motor and replace it with a kick start like on my old Yamaha RD 400 street racer.
Now, I don't know if you could pop a wheelie like the RD's were famous for...... Cheers!
__________________
Huz-Z
BMW Z4 3.0si Roadster. Montego Blue Metallic. Premium and Sport Package. Last edited by Huz-Z; 08-27-2010 at 07:53 AM.. Reason: Silly Friday Post |
Appreciate
0
|
08-27-2010, 09:19 AM | #65 |
Imola Lover
27
Rep 749
Posts |
Just to add more to the Porsche Weight Gain discussion... The 2012 models are all going the E9*M3 route: http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsAr...aspx?AR=251868
...And reposted from Planet-9: [The 911] will evolve into a more luxurious 2+0 GT and move "upmarket" The Cayman/Boxster will also move upmarket as a new 4 cylinder entry level roadster will be developed with VAG (the '356") The new cars will be bigger, more powerful, more economical, more expensive and not look much different than the current cars.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|