ZPOST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   ZPOST > BMW Z4 Technical Talk > Engine, Exhaust, Drivetrain Modifications
  TireRack

SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS!
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-24-2014, 06:12 PM   #1
Shipkiller
Colonel
Shipkiller's Avatar
United_States
187
Rep
2,138
Posts

Drives: Me
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Virginia Beach

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
S54 Engine Issues: The History

Many ///M drivers on here have had rod bearing issues or have read about these issues and have misinformation on the history of the S54.

The following is a re-post of Stonewalks S54 Failure History along with the link to the original web page. The page is sometimes not available. The internet being what it is, information seldom ever goes away.

http://yoy.com/yoy/auto/m3_failwhat.shtml

StoneWalk's S54 Failure History

M3 Rollout - The early days

Our story begins before M3's were even available to the public. There was much publicity and anticipation of the "new" e46M3 which would take over the honored title of M3 from it's predecessors the E30M3 and E36M3. In mid 2000 there had been a few press reviews and test drives, lots of photos, and intense speculation from the enthusiast community. BMW was telegraphing a "Fall 2000" roll out under a 2001 model year designation for the new car.

And then, as late 2000 approached, rumors of delays surfaced. It was all hush hush. No one in authority would comment (this is a recurring theme). But soon it became clear that the M3 would not arrive on time for some reason, and the rumor was that engines were exploding.

After a few months, some semi-official comments were made that indeed a very few motors had failed in testing, that BMW had caught the problem, stopped production, called off the roll out, and was now locating the root cause and re-starting the process.

More details emerged. The failed motors had died catastrophic deaths - broken cranks, thrown rods - major metal mayhem. After initially suspecting that the long inline 6 crank was at fault in the 8000 RPM stressed environment, outside experts were brought in, including none other than tuner Nowack, and the seeming real root cause was located: critical parts in the crank+bearing+block area had been mis-manufactured due to a programming error on the CNC machine which created them. This out of tolerance part had resulted in an oil starvation issue which then overheated the crank and led to overall catastrophic failure (is this sounding familiar yet)?

Because the out of spec parts were already deep inside the stack of motors and M3's being prepared for the roll out, a full halt had to be called on production, and the whole assembly line backed up so that motors could be inspected, removed, parts replaced, and things put right again. This pushed the originally planned ~November 2000 roll out date back 4 months to around March 2001.


M3's arrive

March finally came, and enthusiasts went into a frenzy. M3's were glorious, fun, and kinda raspy it turned out. They clunked a little, but still everyone loved them. Life was good.

And the cars appeared very strong. Some new owners immediately took them to the track, ran them hard, and had not a single problem. Everyone was relieved that the roll out engine health concerns seemed to have been dealt with.

Production trundled along, though it was mighty slow. After shipping around 500 cars in March for the roll out (333 demos - 1 to each dealer, plus a hundred or more customer cars), the following months saw what appeared to be lower numbers - 200 here, 300 there, barely one per average sized dealer in the US. Word was that capacity was totally limited by BMW's ability to build S54 motors at the Munich plant. Long waiting lines continued for eager enthusiasts looking for delivery.

Starting around July and August of 2001, about 6 months into the M3 production run, a couple reports from the US, and from foreign owners surfaced of blown engines. Thrown rods was the word. It was just a couple cases, and both BMW, and the enthusiast community looked at them as likely some kind of driver error - previous generation M3's had been famously easy to mis-shift due to strong gearbox synchros, and one could blow an engine by grabbing 3rd gear instead of 5th at 120 MPH and spinning the motor up to 10k or 12k RPM. A few of the failed-car owners protested vehemently that nothing of the sort had happened, but they were generally dismissed. BMW was famous for making very strong engines, and the manufacturing problem from fall 2000 had long since been located and dealt with - at least this was the thinking at the time.

Of minor interest, in mid 2001, BMW ordered an oil change on the M3 - the 5W30 oil which had been shipping on all cars was ordered changed to a new special BMW-only 10w60. New cars came with the new oil, and 5w30 cars were asked to come in for a free change to 10w60. This seemed to be some kind of reaction to concerns over long term high RPM running ability, and the oil having enough high temperature capacity to hold together on such autobahn blasts.



Late 2001, SMG arrives

As the year 2001 progressed, the SMG gearbox was announced for the next model year, to become available in the US in November built cars. Enthusiasts eagerly awaited this new feature. M3's continued to carry huge long waiting lists - stick or SMG - everyone wanted one.

After some minor fiascos with BMWNA trying to neuter the S6 mode of the SMG gearbox, it arrived on US shores, and at around this same time M3 production gradually ramped up to around 2 to 3 times the rather meager levels which had been accomplished during mid 2001.

A few folks pointed out that one of the really nice things about the SMG was that it was incapable of a missed shift. Those few folks who'd seen blown engines - they'd have been ok with the SMG, since the computer would refuse to obey any requested gearshift that might run the engine over its 8000 RPM limit.

In October 2001, around 800 or so M3's came to the US, essentially all stick shifts.

In November 2001, the SMG option came online, and another 800 to 1000 cars arrived on US shores. Around 80% of them were ordered with the new SMG option, the remaining 20% were sticks.

In December 2001, production appeared to drop - perhaps due to holiday season time off, though there were a couple rumors of a production stop that were never confirmed. Something like 300 to 500 M3's appeared to come to the US in December 2001.

At around this time, a couple of running changes were recorded at the factory. On September 24th 2001, the part number for main crank connecting rod bearing shells for the S54 was changed to a new "red" variant. Strangely, on November 14, 2001 the shells were changed again to an older "yellow" part number which had been used early in the M3 production. At about this same time - on November 8th, 2001 service instruction 11 08 01 was issued raising the connecting rod bearing shell tolerance from 0.03 mm to 0.04 mm along with the advisory that if you ever went to change the connecting rods in an S54 you had to change the entire carefully balanced package, you could not swap out just a few of them or re-use a subset of the bolts from the old ones.

Things were still going pretty good, and as the 2002 calendar year arrived, most everyone was happy with their M3's - a few clunks, rattles and grinding differentials notwithstanding.


Spring 2002 - Fails ramp up

With production cranking along nicely, March through April of 2002 found a series of new reports of M3 engine failures. Most were thrown rods. Some appeared to have been driven hard, others didn't show much sign of it.

BMW's reaction was to aggressively go after the owners of these cars. The engine DME records peak speed, peak RPM, and elapsed time over 7800 RPM. DME's were dumped, and some showed evidence of at least brief operation in the 8100 to 8500 RPM range. As more reports of engine fail hit the Internet ( 3 in March, 5 in April, 10 in May ) BMW began a pattern of regarding any DME data over about 8300 RPM as proof that the driver was at fault, and several stick shift owners were considerably hassled about paying for their $17k new engines.

There was a lot of back and forth. After various threats about the DME data, it became clear that BMW could not really prove when these "peak RPM" events had happened, and it was also becoming clear that the nature of the engine failures didn't really make sense for a pure overrev scenario.

Two major flaws in the "mis-shift overrev" theory came to light:

1. SMG cars were getting failures, and were showing DME data in the 8400 region in a few cases, yet it's impossible for that gearbox to be mis-shifted.

2. Damage to failed engines was typically isolated to one or two of the rod bearings - numbers 3, 4 and 5 being prevalent, and there almost never evidence of top end valve-train damage on the other cylinders. If the motor was massively overreved, the first thing to go is usually the valves (at around 10k RPM, not 8.4k), followed by the bearings at some higher RPM range. Fried specific bearings without any valve damage looked - _strange_.

After a lot of agony for what was becoming a couple dozen or more M3 enthusiasts, BMW inched forward to what appeared to be a policy of eventually replacing all the failed motors under warranty, even in cases where BMW wanted to claim driver fault in these 8200 or 8400 RPM readings. BMW also began to show signs of being less accusational towards SMG owners, since they clearly could not have mis-shifted their car, and the rev limiter should prevent throttle induced overrevs.

BMW didn't seem to see the irony on being hostile towards stick shift owners showing 8300 RPM on their DME, while being kinder to SMG owners with the same set of failed bearings and a similar DME reading of 8300.



The Summer of Discontent 2002

Due to the easy communication of the Internet, enthusiasts began gathering together data on failed M3 motors - one in particular set up a very thorough site to collect up and organize the fail data for analysis.

In June 2002, another dozen failed engine reports surfaced, followed by a similar amount in July. Cars were failing at the rate of about 3 to 4 per week - getting close to one a day, and these were just the reports which happened to reach the Internet.

Some folks screamed in panic. Some argued for calm. BMW very very clearly said _nothing_. When comments could be extracted from BMW staff at any level, the following were the themes:

- Fails are really rare and/or people are lying about it on the Internet.
- All engines which have failed were massively overreved.
- M3 owners don't know how to break in and maintain their cars - we're lucky BMWNA brought the M3 to the US at all.

In general, most folks could already see that these statements were factually incorrect. Many enthusiasts personally knew some of the people with failed motors, so it wasn't all lies. Ample documentation of non-overreved blown motors was available - and an intelligent person would assume BMW had access to this data. And M3 owners were well aware that as a group they were obsessive about their cars and hounded their dealers to do proper maintenance.

As July led to August and September, the patterns in the fail data became more and more clear.

Failed cars were disproportionally coming from 3 specific build months, and more exactly 7 specific build weeks which happened to come almost exactly on a 3 week delay offset from the bearing shell changes back in late 2001. This became known as the ì11/01 era (covering late 10/01, all of 11/01, and early 12/01). Cars made in the 11/01 era were around 20 times more likely to fail than either before or after that time. Massive speculation about the exact failure rate raged on the Internet. Problem being that only BMW had the actual fail stats, and they were not talking. With guesses that perhaps 50 to 70% of all fails got reported onto the net, a general guess is that there is a background M3 bearing failure rate of somewhat less than 1%. And the 11/01 era appears to carry a failure rate more in the 10% range, and is still rising, though at a slowing rate compared to the summer failures.

More data got cooked, and more things were noticed:

1. Fails had no correlation to gearbox, it was just a cross section of whatever was being ordered for each production month. October fails were all sticks because that what was shipping. November fails were 80% SMG, same proportion they were ordered in.
2. Fails looked very much alike. Main rod bearing death, typically on cylinder 3, or perhaps 4 and 5. No signs of valvetrain damage other than that inflicted by the spun bearing.
3. Data showed no correlation to which oil was used, in fact the cars from the 5W30 era were somewhat more robust that the 10W60 cars.
4. The DME dumps of SMG cars appeared to prove that the factory rev limiter was not functioning well, at least not in some cars.
5. Most 11/01 era cars were failing right around 6000 miles
6. January 02 cars and newer saw a few fails, but not at the rate of 11/01.
7. There is a hint of early data that cars newer than March 02 may not be seeing much in the way of bearing failures. BMW may have iteratively fixed the problem.
8. Owners have begun to show that a simple $18.50 oil analysis can detect elevated levels of lead in the engine oil that are markers for imminent bearing failure.

And as more experiences were exchanged, BMWNA's policy on M3 failures became more and more clear.

BMWNA's formal stance is that there may be a few failed motors out there, that customers need to use the right oil, shift properly, break their motors in right, warm them up, and that each failure will be examined on a case by case basis. In other words, BMWNA specifically wants to reserve the right to accuse drivers of being at fault.

This despite massively accumulating evidence that examples of driver-abuse being involved in these fails is vanishingly rare. After what we guess to be several hundred cases of replaced motors, we are not aware of BMWNA ever successfully blaming the failure on the driver. They've attempted it some, insulted a lot of customers, stalled, forced things into litigation in a couple cases, but never once had the customer pay for the replaced motor in the end.

You can spin that positive. If you own and M3, and the motor fails, you're likely to get a new motor under warranty in the end.

And you can spin it negative: You may very well go through a very painful and insulting process along the way to having BMW fix a motor which by all logic was flawed when it was delivered to the customer.

And the sad part here is that BMWNA is not saving a dime with all their accusations and ill will with their customers. Engines are being replaced no matter what.

The three specific areas of focus right now are the following:

A. BMWNA continues to examine spun bearing M3ís and look for opportunities to blame their customers despite massive evidence that the problem is in the motor, not the customer. This is insulting to their customers, and is not saving any money nor protecting any reputation.

B. Despite several hundred examples of bearing death, and its associated symptoms, BMWNA field techs are required to examine each and every unhealthy motor before dealers are allowed to perform and service, and these techs in many cases are still leading with the assumption that despite the car having the tell tale noise and being from the famous 11/01 era, failing bearings is not the most likely cause. Their marching orders appear to be to actively try and NOT find failed bearings, and if they do find them to actively look to blame anyone except BMW. This is again pointless, and inefficient. The rational move is to have a quick and easy test ready for the very large number of ongoing bearing fail cases which are cropping up, and to quickly and politely get new motors into those cars

C. BMWNA is in a communications blackout with their customers on this issue. Customers want to know what's really going on, and believe that BMW knows more than they are saying. Customers would like to see some kind of confidence boosting warranty on the engine bearings to address owner stress and resale value issues, yet BMW is still in a damage-control mode where they won't even discuss the problem let alone take ownership of it. This is doing serious harm to their reputation and the feelings of their most enthusiastic customers, and it doesn't appear to be buying BMWNA anything in return for that suffering. There is obviously a problem with the bearings ñ everyone can see that, and continuing to let the issue fester helps no one.

Appreciate 0
      03-24-2014, 07:38 PM   #2
bjbstewart
Private
bjbstewart's Avatar
United_States
9
Rep
370
Posts

Drives: 2007 BMW Z4MC
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: San Jose, CA

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
Great info - thanks for posting!

According to the foot notes on the site, the last update was March 2003. Does anyone have a follow up to this? How do our 2006-2008 S54's fit in? Are there still fails (or were there when they were new)?

I just got in on a GB for new coated bearings, so will have them for sometime in the future. I will be doing a Blackstone oil analysis later this month to see where my 2007 Z4MC with 37k miles stands...
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Appreciate 0
      03-24-2014, 09:32 PM   #3
XMetal
Colonel
XMetal's Avatar
United_States
1097
Rep
2,846
Posts

Drives: Anything
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 Z4M Coupe  [10.00]
2018 Audi S3  [0.00]
2004 X5  [8.50]
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjbstewart View Post
Great info - thanks for posting!

According to the foot notes on the site, the last update was March 2003. Does anyone have a follow up to this? How do our 2006-2008 S54's fit in? Are there still fails (or were there when they were new)?

I just got in on a GB for new coated bearings, so will have them for sometime in the future. I will be doing a Blackstone oil analysis later this month to see where my 2007 Z4MC with 37k miles stands...
Ditto...Thanks for the informative post

Unfortunately, there are still some documented failures...just do a search on here and on M3forum. My 03/2008 built is already showing 20ppm lead on my last oil analysis with only 28k street driven miles

I think you got the "treated" bearings, right? NOT "coated"?
Appreciate 0
      03-24-2014, 10:08 PM   #4
Finnegan
Dog Listener
Finnegan's Avatar
United_States
701
Rep
7,850
Posts

Drives: Z4M/. Z3M, E36/46 M3
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Teaching the dog to slalom

iTrader: (22)

Quote:
Originally Posted by XMetal View Post
Ditto...Thanks for the informative post

Unfortunately, there are still some documented failures...just do a search on here and on M3forum. My 03/2008 built is already showing 20ppm lead on my last oil analysis with only 28k street driven miles

I think you got the "treated" bearings, right? NOT "coated"?
He has treated, not coated, bearings.
Appreciate 0
      03-24-2014, 11:25 PM   #5
yousefnjr
salty cowboys fan
yousefnjr's Avatar
6114
Rep
3,392
Posts

Drives: ‘06 Z4MR, ‘20 X7, ‘22 M4x
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (2)

Good read, thanks for sharing
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2014, 08:14 AM   #6
Walkurie
Lieutenant
Walkurie's Avatar
United_States
9
Rep
452
Posts

Drives: 06 M Roadster / 99 Jaguar XK8
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Surf City, CA

iTrader: (2)

Appreciate the factual nature of the background data. A lot of this is scattered about the Internet, and anyone taking the time to bring it together is a hero IMHO.

Sadly, such is the case of many high performance engines from many OEM's over the years. The good news is that enthusiasts like our group take the time to work out solutions and advise anyone who takes the time to listen. Also appreciate Finnegan's reference to treated replacement bearings.
__________________
Vibra Technics engine mounts / Rogue trans mounts / Stoptech brakes / original owner
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2014, 09:50 AM   #7
bjbstewart
Private
bjbstewart's Avatar
United_States
9
Rep
370
Posts

Drives: 2007 BMW Z4MC
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: San Jose, CA

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finnegan View Post
He has treated, not coated, bearings.
Yes, thanks for the correction...
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2014, 11:33 AM   #8
Shipkiller
Colonel
Shipkiller's Avatar
United_States
187
Rep
2,138
Posts

Drives: Me
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Virginia Beach

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
My bearings were one of the last set of BMW Motorsport (WPC treated) bearings before they were discontinued last year.
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2014, 11:37 AM   #9
inTgr8r
Lieutenant General
inTgr8r's Avatar
Canada
2422
Rep
11,665
Posts

Drives: M2 Comp
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (10)

found it interesting...
"Data showed no correlation to which oil was used, in fact the cars from the 5W30 era were somewhat more robust that the 10W60 cars"
__________________
'21 M2C Hockenheim Silver
'18 718 Cayman S Lava Orange (sold)
'13 E92 M3 Santorini Blue (sold)
'07 Z4 M Coupe Alpine White (sold)
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 PM.




zpost
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST