|
|
SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-12-2010, 03:06 PM | #24 |
Major
76
Rep 1,324
Posts |
Wow that was kickass, that he knows Canon gear.
__________________
Was: 2008 335xi sedan 6MT Black Sapphire Metallic
Is: 2014 Tesla P85D (Blue Metallic) Wife's: 2013 Infiniti G37 S sedan 6MT, Black |
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 09:53 AM | #25 |
Colonel
174
Rep 2,355
Posts |
lol
nice video. 18-55mm kit lens... nice.. charged $1400?? I'd also do $700-1000 with much better equipment and post processing.. lol shxt..
__________________
2015 F80 Fully loaded (minus the CCB) YMB M3 / Individual Amaro Brown
BBS | KW | Vorsteiner | IND | Akrapovic | BMW CF Performance Interior | Brembo | Eibach 2008 E92 335i (sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2010, 07:53 PM | #27 |
Captain
45
Rep 829
Posts |
I disagree with almost everyone here. Owning a 1D doesn't make you a professional. I shoot better photos with my iPhone than friends with a 5DMK2. I own a 7D and 5D btw.
I think the judge was showing off his photography knowledge and not listening to the defendant. Not every photographer starts off with expensive body/lens. Her photos weren't great, but they weren't complete crap either. $1,200 for wedding photography is kinda cheap if you ask me. My opinion. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2010, 08:31 PM | #28 | |
Banned
646
Rep 24,685
Posts
Drives: '04 330i ZHP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
Quote:
$1200 is cheap for a wedding for someone who can show you quality work... hers wasn't worth that much, even though her posing (from what I saw) wasn't horrible, the quality wasn't there and the fact she had printed it all off at walmart is just redic. Last edited by UdubBadger; 03-23-2010 at 10:30 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2010, 10:24 PM | #29 | |
Captain
45
Rep 829
Posts |
True, true. I didn't think about the 100s of wedding under her belt. With that much experience, she should be investing in professional equipment by then. Walmart prints FTW. Haha.
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2010, 10:49 PM | #30 | |
Bootleggin' 'n Gunrunnin'
143
Rep 2,372
Posts |
Quote:
I'll agree that the person behind the camera has a huge impact and some can do amazing things with "entry-level" gear. But if someone shoots a lot, they tend to become very knowledgeable on the subject as well, and could have answered the judge's questions easily.
__________________
Scott
2024 G01 X3 M40i, Brooklyn Grey Metallic /// 2015 F15 X5 35i, Space Gray Metallic, 99K miles /// 2013 F30 320xi, Mojave Metallic, 112k miles 2019 Ford F450 STX, Oxford White 2013 Ducati Multistrada Touring S, Red |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-25-2010, 11:29 PM | #31 |
Second Lieutenant
47
Rep 220
Posts |
That's hilarious! I am an absolute novice photographer, and I have a body one step better (XSi) and the same lens, which is the crappy one that comes with it. Unbelievable.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-31-2010, 12:08 AM | #32 |
Justin Herass
354
Rep 1,205
Posts |
At that point its not even about the money anymore. The bride now has no good wedding photos of her wedding, and the bitch photographer was basically slapping her in the face for taking her to court. I would have rather taken that photographer down an alley and beat the hell out of her then get my money back. I cant believe someone is that cold to screw someone over on their wedding day.
The photographer clearly had no idea about any type if photography at all. I wouldnt be surprised if she had no idea about any of the camera gear she owned.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|