|
|
SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
02-17-2011, 04:09 AM | #89 | |
Major
49
Rep 1,135
Posts |
if it is rubbing on the inside why don't you just run a spacer?
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2011, 06:31 AM | #90 |
Captain
79
Rep 672
Posts |
I stated wrong then, or not clear enough anyway. All of the rubbing is occurring on the outside, not the inside. Up front the rubbing is where the inner liner meets the bumper cover. In back, the top outside part of the tire hits the inner fender liner or possibly the fender lip. I need a negative spacer - the offsets are too aggressive. A smaller tire would help possibly but I think could still rub. I don't want a stretched-out looking tire-wheel combo either - hate that look.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2011, 11:15 AM | #93 |
Captain
79
Rep 672
Posts |
Wheels are F 9" et38, R 10" et27. I realize that my tire choice is not helping the situation but they are optimal tire sizes for the wheels. That said, these wheels were purpose made for a perfect fit on E46 M3 and were a gamble for fit on the Z4M. My opinion is that the offset is about 5-8 mm too aggressive for the Z4M. On stock suspension it barely works. Any lowering would require a smaller tire and an aggressive alignment, and still might get rubbing. I have the front camber maxed out within what I can do with no camber plates. Honestly, I don't want much more than that because it is primarily a street car that we take on road trips and what not. I'll look for some bigger pics. When you sight down along the side of the car, the outer face of the wheel is dead on flush with the fender or may even protrude out a bit; viewing angle can make it look better or worse. But....I really didn't desire for something that aggressive on this car. What can I say, it was a gamble. The wheels are truly unique and maybe for a different Z4M owner would be the cat's meow, but I think I'm going to move on.
Pics - on stock suspension. I dunno - every time I step back a look at it man, they are pretty racy looking. Maybe I should try a size down on tires. If I did, does 245/40 front and 275/35 rear sound right? These would have the closest side wall height to each other, and the 275/35 won't screw up the speedometer/DSC too much, right? Hard to decide to spend another $800-900 on tires just to see if it will work or not....
__________________
Last edited by onebluemcm; 02-17-2011 at 11:23 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2011, 09:50 AM | #94 |
Major General
430
Rep 5,329
Posts |
heeelllppp... will i rub up front with 19x8.5 et32, stock suspension and 235/35/19???
hellpp please guys??
__________________
Z4MR VT2 - Clubsport build.
Multi award winning Detailing | Wrap | PPF specialists UK based - www.topwrapz.com |
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2011, 09:25 PM | #95 |
Mouper
122
Rep 1,064
Posts |
Would these Style 5's fit Z4M?
http://forum.e46fanatics.com/showthread.php?t=821890 |
Appreciate
0
|
02-22-2011, 05:54 AM | #97 |
New Member
0
Rep 14
Posts |
Onebluemcm - Your car is awsome. really agressif look.
I'm waiting for my BBS Challenge wheels but it takes 4 weeks I followed some recomandations around here and took for my Z4 roadster ( suspention Sport OEM bmw) R 255/35/18 not 19" with 10J and ET35 and F 225/40/18 8.5J ET35 from your expirience.. should be ok no ? |
Appreciate
0
|
02-22-2011, 08:52 AM | #98 |
Major General
430
Rep 5,329
Posts |
perfect, thankyou for this... thursday is BBK install, studs n nuts and et32 upfront ;-)
__________________
Z4MR VT2 - Clubsport build.
Multi award winning Detailing | Wrap | PPF specialists UK based - www.topwrapz.com |
Appreciate
0
|
02-26-2011, 07:01 AM | #99 |
MMA fighter and F1 test driver
18
Rep 362
Posts |
19"x9.0" +31mm Front
19"x10.0" +25mm Rear M3 Comp Wheels, I keep getting different answers, Please help. Will this fit a z4 M coupe without rubbing? 245F 275 rear tires. Thanks all =)
__________________
NOW:08 M.Coupe SMB #102/248 #1669/1815
:|MORRVS8|APEX8|SS.X-pipe|SS.PW.Loop|AFE.intake|Matte.grill|short.ant|Z HP.knob|interior.LED|bulletproof 09 Audi Q5 THEN:96Accord|98Camry|04TSX SC|06 M3|06A4|05Civic Si|05Imprezza|05S2000|08FJ |
Appreciate
0
|
02-26-2011, 04:16 PM | #100 | |
///M-fanatic
197
Rep 3,885
Posts |
Quote:
245 fronts and 275 rears are max as far as I'm concerned, unless you do some extra work to fit them; more than just fender rolling and some negative camber. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-26-2011, 04:26 PM | #101 |
Major
58
Rep 1,224
Posts |
Sorry guys, a slightly OT question. While looking at various wheel manufacturers, occassionally I'll see the restriction "rear use only". I'm guessing that the load rating for that specific width/offset isn't high enough for use on the front? Anyone know for sure? TIA
__________________
If you can't take the time to teach a kid something good, someone will take the time to teach them something bad.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-26-2011, 11:44 PM | #102 | |
///M-fanatic
197
Rep 3,885
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-26-2011, 11:46 PM | #103 | |
///M-fanatic
197
Rep 3,885
Posts |
Quote:
The rears should clear no problem. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-27-2011, 07:31 PM | #104 | |
Captain
79
Rep 672
Posts |
EDIT - I'm full of s#it.
Quote:
EDIT - I'm full of s#it. The above statement is wrong, wrong, wrong. Don't know what I was thinking. 9" et31 would give more clearance to the strut than my 9" et38. My guess is that et31 on a 9" wheel will have too much rub on the fender or fender liner. Man, I'm an idiot
__________________
Last edited by onebluemcm; 03-07-2011 at 06:26 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2011, 09:05 PM | #105 | |
Banned
496
Rep 10,309
Posts
Drives: A///MERICAN!!!
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: A///MERICA!!!
|
Quote:
Not my style, but found the picture: |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2011, 11:05 PM | #106 |
///M-fanatic
197
Rep 3,885
Posts |
You mean the inside center portion of the wheel? Yeah, I've heard that it's do-able for most wheel materials. However, I've never really felt all that inclined to alter an already-made wheel. I suppose working on a forged wheel might be okay, but still..the thought of "harming" the wheel is kind of a turn-off
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-06-2011, 11:07 PM | #107 | |
///M-fanatic
197
Rep 3,885
Posts |
Quote:
Hence why I was thinking about using the rear wheels from my non-M fitment set of LE37's (which were also 9" width, but with +43 offset), and put them up front on the MC. But someone already paid for the LE's |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2011, 06:53 AM | #108 | |
Captain
79
Rep 672
Posts |
Quote:
More importantly, going at any wheel flange with a grinder would be like trying to restore a fine piece of art with a belt sander, or something. Do not do this!! The wheel flange, that mates up to the hub/rotor has to be as near perfectly parallel with the rim as possible. When it's out of parallel, it's called runout, this is a bad thing. All wheels will have some runout but on the best wheels it's miniscule. Aside from a CNC shop with an engineer or highly experienced operator, there is basically no practical way to remove material from the flange in any precise way. I think it would be hard to find a CNC shop that would be willing to do this simply for liability reasons.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2011, 09:08 AM | #109 | |
Major
58
Rep 1,224
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
If you can't take the time to teach a kid something good, someone will take the time to teach them something bad.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2011, 11:36 AM | #110 |
Viper Driver
36
Rep 1,311
Posts |
F: 18x8.5 et35 with 245/40
R: 18x9.5 et35 with 265/40 will the rears clear the inside of the rear wheel wells? calculators are showing 11mm less wheel to strut clearance. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|