|
|
SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-14-2013, 09:22 AM | #5 |
Eyedoc - Retired
0
Rep 4
Posts |
Jerry is correct
Jerry is correct, that is not a Rolex President. Compare it to this photo of a (my) President. Note the day and date display and the band. These mark the identifying signature of "The President" model: (other dials, etc are available)
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2013, 09:52 AM | #6 |
Captain
32
Rep 782
Posts |
Too blingy for my taste. My DD watches are a Breitling B01 and a Rolex Sub that I have had for 11 years now. GLWS
__________________
2011 30i
[SIGPIC]/SIGPIC] |
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2013, 02:14 PM | #8 |
First Lieutenant
51
Rep 382
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2013, 05:16 PM | #9 | |
Private First Class
25
Rep 160
Posts |
Quote:
Not to mention calling that watch a President is the equivalent of calling a 128i an M5. How about taking the time to make a description about the watch's history and if it includes any documentation to prove its authenticity. As far as we know, you're selling a $100 replica. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2013, 07:46 PM | #10 | |
First Lieutenant
51
Rep 382
Posts |
Quote:
Chill out random guy. Was not my intention to piss on you and call it rain. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2013, 07:47 PM | #11 |
First Lieutenant
51
Rep 382
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-14-2013, 07:56 PM | #12 |
First Lieutenant
51
Rep 382
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2013, 10:13 AM | #13 | |
Private First Class
25
Rep 160
Posts |
Quote:
It sounds like you are fairly new to the world of timepieces/watches so I’ll say that it is impossible to confirm a Rolex’s authenticity even with high definition pictures. Recently, a friend of mine sent me about 10 ultra high quality pictures (with a dslr camera) of a Rolex Daytona 116509 he had inherited from his grandfather. -It passed the basic gold test with a magnet (he did not want to do an actual gold test by scratching off some of the material) -The dial was correct -The hand lengths were correct -It had a serial number which was correctly numbered for the time period -It had an automatic movement that had a 48+ hour power reserve -He even took it to a local authorized Rolex retailer who could not confirm it was a fake Long story short, the watch was sent in to Rolex for a final confirmation. When they opened the case, they concluded that it was in fact a replica/fake. We are talking about a replica of a $35,000 watch that was inspected by several experts both online and in person and it still could not be confirmed to be a replica until it reached Rolex’s official repair center. I hope whomever bought the watch from you plans to send it in to be authenticated. I would really hate for someone to buy a $3000+ replica. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|