|
|
SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
06-12-2024, 08:02 PM | #1 |
First Lieutenant
110
Rep 317
Posts |
Need to ask 2024
In todays time is z4mr the better but or a 2003 986 boxster s?
I’ve been a bmw person all my life. This car would be second car for weekends. Looking for advice. |
06-13-2024, 08:48 AM | #3 |
Private First Class
18
Rep 142
Posts |
OUCH!!!
__________________
If you want to be happy for a day, drink. If you want to be happy for a year, marry. If you want to be happy for a lifetime, drive a BMW Z4!
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2024, 03:32 PM | #5 |
Colonel
142
Rep 2,000
Posts |
I would recommend driving both and making a decision. I had 2002 Boxster 2.7 from new on a 4yr lease and loved it. Then went to a 2006 Honda S2000. When that lease ended I considered going back to a Boxster but couldn't justify the cost difference over a Z4M on the used market. Recently my nephew bought a new Boxster GTS 4.0. It is a fantastic car for sure but when he offered it to me for the princely sum of 125K (he has about 150k into the car) I started building out a 2025 Z4 M40i manual. At 72k it seems like a screaming deal in comparison (especially after I test drove an automatic Z4 M40i last week).
Now I am trying to sell my 2006 Z4M. If you are interested, send me a PM and I will give you the details. It has under 21k on the clock. Pristine. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2024, 06:16 PM | #7 | |
First Lieutenant
110
Rep 317
Posts |
Quote:
Huz-Z seen that but I guess I was looking for real world experiences. FWIW I’ve been bmw all my life and went I test drove the z4mr it felt good but something was off about it. Could have been that particular one tbh |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-13-2024, 09:36 PM | #8 |
Colonel
1211
Rep 2,929
Posts
Drives: Anything
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
|
Chickdr is selling a vert!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-15-2024, 05:38 PM | #9 | |
Captain
808
Rep 864
Posts |
Quote:
If you want a well-balanced hairdresser's car, get the Boxster. Or save yourself some money and get its cheaper, front-engined Japanese equivalent, the Miata. They are far closer to each other than they are to the experience you'll get from the Z4M. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-16-2024, 04:08 PM | #10 |
dances with roads
5021
Rep 4,121
Posts |
They're very different driving experiences. The 986 is mid-engined and will reward the smooth driver with balanced handling and high cornering limits. The Z4M is a front-engined hoon machine that likes to be grabbed by the scruff of the neck. As others have said, drive both and see which fits your desires better. If you've always driven BMWs then the likely outcome is going to be the zed.
In terms of value both are currently screaming bargains. In terms of cost of ownership the 986 is more likely to be the one to make you cry. Do some research on M96 and M97 engines to see why. |
Appreciate
1
Efthreeoh18667.00 |
06-17-2024, 04:19 PM | #11 |
Lieutenant General
2387
Rep 12,634
Posts
Drives: Z4 M, X5, GX460
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CT
iTrader: (100)
Garage List E86 Z4 M [10.00]
F15 X5 xDrive35i [9.17] F10 550i (Retired) [9.17] F25 X3 xDrive35i (R ... [9.43] E82 135is (Retired) [9.53] E85 Z4 M (Retired) [9.41] E90 328i xDrive (Re ... [9.25] E86 Z4 3.0si (Retired) [8.93] |
I honestly don’t think most folks can appreciate the rawness of the M over the 986 as highlighted in that old Top Gear video. How many folks have really gotten their cars sideways? Honestly for everyday driving the Porsche will be better. Plus it has overall better build quality imo, as well as more aftermarket support. And as for IMS failure, it’s not that different from RB & Vanos imo. You’ll need to budget some dollars to bulletproof either motor.
That said these cars weren’t ever about practicality. For me it’s always been about the rarity of the chassis and the last naturally aspirated inline 6 from M division. It’s just a special car, period. Last edited by 3002 tii; 06-17-2024 at 06:20 PM.. |
06-18-2024, 10:01 AM | #13 | |
Lieutenant General
2387
Rep 12,634
Posts
Drives: Z4 M, X5, GX460
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CT
iTrader: (100)
Garage List E86 Z4 M [10.00]
F15 X5 xDrive35i [9.17] F10 550i (Retired) [9.17] F25 X3 xDrive35i (R ... [9.43] E82 135is (Retired) [9.53] E85 Z4 M (Retired) [9.41] E90 328i xDrive (Re ... [9.25] E86 Z4 3.0si (Retired) [8.93] |
Quote:
If I’m being honest, the only time I enjoy driving the M is whenever I miss driving a manual, and so I’d probably get the same satisfaction from a 986 or even a Miata. In fact I actually prefer driving my x5 with its modern amenities over the Z for weekdays. But if you’re a track rat, the Z4 M will not disappoint. I did my first event of the season few weeks back and I felt like a new owner all over again. Everything about the car, even its imperfections, are perfect on track. 50/50 distribution plus short wheel base and tendency for snap oversteer… love it. Naturally aspirated inline with 8k redline (without lag, heat soak or over heating issues)… all day everyday. Last edited by 3002 tii; 06-24-2024 at 10:35 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
jwolf79.50 |
06-18-2024, 01:06 PM | #14 | |
Colonel
1211
Rep 2,929
Posts
Drives: Anything
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
|
Quote:
With that said, these cars won't impress anyone in terms of acceleration in today's standards. My wife's stock 4 banger Audi S3 can snap off a quicker 0-anthing time than the Z without even trying. If you enjoy driving, I will take the Z4 over the Boxster/Cayman all day long. The only Cayman that I will ever consider to replace the Z is a GT4/GTS 4.0. The question that always asked myself is will that GT4 deliver 4x-5x the amount of fun as the Z to justify the trade?
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2024, 07:57 PM | #15 |
First Lieutenant
110
Rep 317
Posts |
I’ve had extensive time on e46 m3 coupe.
The engine tbh felt way different. Which leads me to believe the example I drove might have been off. I know during the test drive I hit redline on 2 gear a few times. and near redline on 3rd gear. I just did t feel the shove that I remember of my old m3. I feel this is what left me most unimpressed. For some reason it just didn’t feel as fast as my old m3 I’ve actually never sat in any Porsche but everyone does sing high praise of it so I was contemplating. I would say the z4mr steering wheel was so thick I loved it. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2024, 07:16 PM | #16 |
Private First Class
91
Rep 173
Posts |
When I was cross shopping the two, both were nice, but man that generation Boxster has absolutely no storage!! Not even door pockets. I need a place to put my wallet, sunglasses, and whatever else...
I know its weird but between that and ease of maintenance (and quality of examples in my price range) the Z easily won. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2024, 09:05 PM | #18 |
New Member
2
Rep 8
Posts |
Don't get mad, but the 2.5i is a joy and parts are plentiful. Probably will be for a long time. Maintenance costs will be considerably lower as well.
Trust me unless your an enthusiast who drives quite a bit you'll want a z4m but to regular people, they just like the car. If you can get a clean one with not a lot of wear it'll last a while and fill your weekend with joy. Get one optioned with seat warmers if you can. Wife will probably like it a bit more than the M too, just saying ") |
Appreciate
0
|
06-29-2024, 09:40 PM | #20 | |
Lieutenant
591
Rep 597
Posts |
Quote:
For one if you like the meatier steering wheel and hydraulic steering of the M it will fall short right there. Sure you can do swaps on both accounts but that’s work to consider if you want to go that route. That said there’s so many here that hate the fat wheel and have no qualms about the eps. The M54 is much smoother in power delivery and lower redline than what the S54 has and feel. My 03 2.5 with ess vt1 s/c has a different type of excitement than a N/A S54. From the description that you’ve given of what you want, the 2.5 won’t offer. Not knocking it just saying from what you want, the 2.5 is not it. |
|
Appreciate
1
pungo960.50 |
06-30-2024, 11:17 AM | #21 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1225
Rep 1,584
Posts |
I, too, am thinking something maybe was off with the example you drove, OP. You should feel a little something once you clear 3k RPM but then feel the engine hit it's stride at 4k and above. I would consider both instances to be obvious.
I've only test driven a 981 CS once but nothing large stood out to me wrt performance. Granted, it was a test drive so I didn't "get on it" aside from being a a little heavy footed from a stop and some curves on empty backroads. The guy from the dealership was actually encouraging me to push the car more but I didn't. Comparing the S54 to a MA103 certainly has notable contrasts but the latter, too, doesn't have a lot of low end grunt either. Like the S54, it wants to be at 4k and above (and sounds oh so good...). I still find the E86 M more raw than either P-car and I understand why folks consider the 991 more of a GT car. I'd also say that I, surprisingly, like the ergo (and thick steering wheel) of the E86 M more than both the 981 and 991, though. Overall, different beasts for different wants. Choose the poison that best suits your taste. You can't go wrong with either.
__________________
- Jeff
bosstones' flickr |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|