View Single Post
      08-27-2019, 03:06 PM   #31
clee1982
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
796
Rep
1,736
Posts

Drives: 2019 BMW 540i xDrive
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
I see this kind moral argument being making all the time, but we generally are not making those judgement, we either evade or break as hard as we can without "active" thinking (otherwise it's definitely too late already).

I understand the desire to hold machine to higher standard but some of those moral questions doesn't really exist. What if it's learning based and just do like human 50% of the time evade 50% of the time stop. Is that "wrong"?

might not be optimal but doing no worse than the best human can do sounds at least semi reasonable

Edit: and before someone ask why bother with Autonomous Driving if it's only as good as human, my answer would be if it's at least the best human can do, BUT all the time would be great improvement already
Appreciate 0