View Single Post
      04-25-2018, 04:32 PM   #17
just-right
Enlisted Member
57
Rep
34
Posts

Drives: Z4M
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

I managed to run the simulation of the first draft canard. I positioned and shaped it to complement the lower line of the side ducts.

Name:  Canard-Start-V1-edit.jpg
Views: 1622
Size:  142.6 KB

Aerodynamically it is doing what it is supposed to. It raises the static pressure on the top surface and increases the suction underneath. This pressure difference yields the formation of a vortex which when working correctly will help manage the wheel wake. Unfortunately although aerofoil shaped, the suction on this first canard iteration is very peaky and too much on the nose of the element. The by-product is that the vortex health is suboptimal and dissipates too quickly.

Name:  Streamlines-edit.jpg
Views: 1593
Size:  70.2 KB

There are some good opportunities to improve the aerodynamic properties drastically by redistributing the pressure and managing the vortex strength. This will benefit the local performance and downstream influence.

What do you guys think is it getting a bit more aggressive? More to come!
Appreciate 2
Mirko182.00