|
|
SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-12-2010, 07:37 AM | #24 | |
First Lieutenant
9
Rep 316
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2010, 06:55 AM | #25 |
BMW Fan
11
Rep 553
Posts |
Vic, if you have 275 tires on the back with an offset of 22, you are effectively decreasing the tire to fender clearance by 18 mm. That is quite a lot when combined with lowering. I am also concerned that there may be rubbing against the fender lip. Reducing tire size to 255 or 265 on the rear may provide sufficient clearance, but the 275s are certainly nicer if you can manage it.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2010, 06:58 AM | #26 |
First Lieutenant
9
Rep 316
Posts |
Yes, the package sits 18mm further out, however, the overall diameter of the package is about 10mm LESS. It's combination of the two. I know it will be close.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 03:13 PM | #27 | |
Lieutenant
16
Rep 421
Posts |
Quote:
Quick phone pic for reference Hopefully theres 3mm more room there; Last edited by Nate2046; 02-02-2011 at 10:59 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 04:46 PM | #28 |
First Lieutenant
9
Rep 316
Posts |
Thanks Nate.
Yours absolutely look more "tucked in" than my 19x9.5 ET22's. Still happy with the ride? Not too 'bouncy'? Shocks and struts handling the higher spring rates OK? |
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 05:18 PM | #29 |
Major General
374
Rep 8,033
Posts |
The rears look good as far as I can tell from the pics--the camera angle can be deceptive though. The camber should become more negative under compression, so it appears you will be fine. Good luck!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|