ZPOST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   ZPOST > BMW Z4 Roadster and Coupe > General BMW Z4 Forum
  TireRack

SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS!
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-08-2014, 10:17 AM   #1
Spaceman Spiff
Captain
86
Rep
847
Posts

Drives: R8, 996 C2, Z4MR (sold)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SF Bay

iTrader: (1)

Z4M v. E89 sdrive35is

Sorry of this has been covered before.

I am considering an upgrade and have been looking at E89s for a few weeks, mostly 35is but also 35i. Z4M seems like a very reasonable alternative, with better performance (albeit not as torque-y) and considerably lower price. However, given that it's an older car (and an M), I was wondering what the maintenance costs would be like on a 2006-7 model with around 50K miles, which seems to be the typical for-sale Z4M profile. Also, is there a specific model year to look for?
Appreciate 0
      08-08-2014, 10:58 AM   #2
The HACK
Midlife Crises Racing Silent but Deadly Class
The HACK's Avatar
1820
Rep
5,337
Posts

Drives: 2006 MZ4C, 2021 Tesla Model 3
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Welcome to Jamaica have a nice day

iTrader: (1)

Considering that the N54/N55 engine needs a $500-800 valve cleaning every 30,000 miles and $100 worth of spark plugs every 45,000 miles, the maintenance on the M isn't any more expensive than the 35is depending on how often you change your oil.
__________________
Sitting on a beat-up office chair in front of a 5 year old computer in a basement floor, sipping on stale coffee watching a bunch of meaningless numbers scrolling aimlessly on a dimly lit 19” monitor.
Appreciate 0
      08-09-2014, 11:12 AM   #3
Spaceman Spiff
Captain
86
Rep
847
Posts

Drives: R8, 996 C2, Z4MR (sold)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SF Bay

iTrader: (1)

Thanks man! That sounds perfectly reasonable for the 5k miles or so that I drive every year. Another question: Is there a reason not to go supercharged? A couple of cars currently available here are supercharged and it's very tempting!
Appreciate 0
      08-09-2014, 12:13 PM   #4
donoman
Rookie
31
Rep
379
Posts

Drives: 03 Z4 2.5i 5MT
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Santa Clara, CA

iTrader: (1)

Any time you run boost you are wearing the engine internals faster than without. It's not exactly "free" power as you will decrease your reliability. How much? Enough that it matters? That's a harder question to answer. If you're only driving 5k per year might not be too bad...
__________________
2003 Z4 2.5i
2013 FR-S
1990 911 C2
1983 Wife
Appreciate 0
      08-09-2014, 12:18 PM   #5
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
It depends on whether you have more time or money. You can't beat OEM in terms of reliability and fit/finish. A supercharged car requires more knowledge of the car and a lot of DIY. You'll need a knowledgable performance shop to service the car.

The blower on my M has been largely transparent other than the massive increase in power. The 3.0i has been a different story. If you don't need the car as a daily driver, supercharging is great. I would personally take a supercharged M over a newer Z4, no doubt about it. I don't know about buying a used car with aftermarket FI though. The car must have a very thorough inspection at a shop of my choice.
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      08-09-2014, 01:00 PM   #6
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
Since the question of boost killing the life of an engine has come up before, and I've got a few minutes to burn...

Running a stock engine to 8k rpm will cause more wear and tear than boosting it to 6-8 psi and running to 5k rpm, assuming the car is properly tuned and sorted.

There are many facets to an engine's mechanical limits; each type of stress comes with its own possible failures. High rpm requires an engine to have good tensile strength, and boosting an engine requires compressive strength. Because the heat from compression makes fuel quality the first limit encountered with a tuned engine under boost (aka detonation), the S54 is proven to have more than enough strength to handle the compressive loads. I'm admittedly simplifying it, as boost = bigger boom = more torque = potentially more wear on other components (like oil being squeezed away from bearings)... but my point is that you will probably encounter a failure from other loads or wear and tear before the additional stress from boost culminates into catastrophic failure. You should be more concerned with revving to 8k rpm than boosting to 6 psi. Replace your rod bearings several times through the life of the engine, add a blower, and enjoy the S54's awesome sky-high redline.

IMHO, there's no need to deny yourself certain satisfactions for fear of additional wear and tear, when another culprit is likely to be the death of the engine. Colin Chapman (Lotus) once said that the perfect racing car would win a race and then fall apart on the finish line. I've treated my cars the same way - boost up to the point that everything will wear out at the same time... best guess at least
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      08-09-2014, 01:49 PM   #7
David70
Colonel
United_States
1567
Rep
2,665
Posts

Drives: 06 Z4M Coupe - 13 Cadillac ATS
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, OH

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff View Post
Thanks man! That sounds perfectly reasonable for the 5k miles or so that I drive every year. Another question: Is there a reason not to go supercharged? A couple of cars currently available here are supercharged and it's very tempting!
From a value standpoint it doesn't seem like what the car is worth goes up much considering what it costs to supercharge it. Depends on how long you plan on keeping the car and how much you would enjoy the extra power. Buy a Z4M, supercharge it and sell it next year and it becomes an expensive year of use.
__________________
2006 Z4M Coupe - Stromung exhaust, ZHP knob, stubby antenna, clutch delay delete
Appreciate 0
      08-09-2014, 02:27 PM   #8
ZStig
instagram 997turbotom
279
Rep
7,377
Posts

Drives: Interlagos Z4MR
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Delray Beach, FL

iTrader: (4)

I think buying a used supercharged Z4M is great bang for the buck. Not doing it yourself for $9k unless you keep the car supercharged for 3+ years. Then when you pro-rate it, it makes sense

I've actually considered a Sdrive35 + exhaust + tune as a replacement vehicle, because its a lot more refined for daily driving. The poor resale of an 81k mile supercharged Z4M keeps me from trading that way
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-10-2014, 06:51 AM   #9
Vanne
Down Under!!
Vanne's Avatar
United Arab Emirates
1621
Rep
4,294
Posts

Drives: 2007 Z4MC
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Dubai

iTrader: (4)

From all accounts I've read on the e89, it drives and handles like a wet blanket.
Do yourself a favour and go drive one for a bit before buying one.
Appreciate 0
      08-10-2014, 10:48 AM   #10
Spaceman Spiff
Captain
86
Rep
847
Posts

Drives: R8, 996 C2, Z4MR (sold)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SF Bay

iTrader: (1)

Thanks everyone!

So to sum it up: Supercharged may need more frequent maintenance and not be as reliable as a daily driver, but won't make much of a difference in engine life?

I will be using the car as a daily driver so reliability is certainly a factor. That said, the additional power/torque is still very tempting. I think I'll continue to look at stock engines but may go for a clean supercharged. Is there a specific kit that's been more reliable than others?

W/r/t E89, I agree that it is just not a purpose-built sport car. Every review that I have read says it's a step away from a true roadster and toward a comfortable cruiser like the SLK. It's a shame as I really like the design
Appreciate 0
      08-10-2014, 11:01 AM   #11
Huz-Z
Brigadier General
Huz-Z's Avatar
Canada
849
Rep
4,057
Posts

Drives: Z4 3.0si, 328 XDrive, X5 35i
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Based on the above, If you are tracking the car I would think an E85M would be the best choice . But for a daily driver an E89 might do the trick for you.
Appreciate 0
      08-10-2014, 12:09 PM   #12
XMetal
Colonel
XMetal's Avatar
United_States
1131
Rep
2,866
Posts

Drives: Anything
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 Z4M Coupe  [10.00]
2018 Audi S3  [0.00]
2004 X5  [8.50]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff View Post
Thanks everyone!

So to sum it up: Supercharged may need more frequent maintenance and not be as reliable as a daily driver, but won't make much of a difference in engine life?

I will be using the car as a daily driver so reliability is certainly a factor. That said, the additional power/torque is still very tempting. I think I'll continue to look at stock engines but may go for a clean supercharged. Is there a specific kit that's been more reliable than others?

W/r/t E89, I agree that it is just not a purpose-built sport car. Every review that I have read says it's a step away from a true roadster and toward a comfortable cruiser like the SLK. It's a shame as I really like the design
To further rain on you parade...Unless you "know someone", you will have a very tough time registering a supercharged Z4 in California.
Appreciate 0
      08-10-2014, 01:38 PM   #13
yousefnjr
salty cowboys fan
yousefnjr's Avatar
6158
Rep
3,406
Posts

Drives: ‘06 Z4MR, ‘20 X7, ‘22 M4x
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (2)

35is: no manual, no LSD, no thanks
Appreciate 0
      08-10-2014, 04:27 PM   #14
Schlesien
Enlisted Member
0
Rep
49
Posts

Drives: 2007 Bmw Z 4 M Coupe
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Sonoma, California

iTrader: (0)

Amen
Appreciate 0
      08-10-2014, 09:13 PM   #15
chickdr
Lieutenant Colonel
140
Rep
1,990
Posts

Drives: 2006 M Roadster
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buford, GA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff View Post
Thanks everyone!

So to sum it up: Supercharged may need more frequent maintenance and not be as reliable as a daily driver, but won't make much of a difference in engine life?

I will be using the car as a daily driver so reliability is certainly a factor. That said, the additional power/torque is still very tempting. I think I'll continue to look at stock engines but may go for a clean supercharged. Is there a specific kit that's been more reliable than others?

W/r/t E89, I agree that it is just not a purpose-built sport car. Every review that I have read says it's a step away from a true roadster and toward a comfortable cruiser like the SLK. It's a shame as I really like the design
The thing is it appears you currently have a 2.5i motor right? Going to the stock 3.2 M motor will be a HUGE boost in performance. Heck, a 3.0si would be a massive gain on its own over the 2.5. I assume you have driven an M to compare with your car?
Appreciate 0
      08-10-2014, 10:44 PM   #16
The HACK
Midlife Crises Racing Silent but Deadly Class
The HACK's Avatar
1820
Rep
5,337
Posts

Drives: 2006 MZ4C, 2021 Tesla Model 3
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Welcome to Jamaica have a nice day

iTrader: (1)

I PERSONALLY wouldn't touch a FI car that didn't come from the factory that way. Unless you know the person who did the work and are intimately familiar with the work done, and know exactly who tuned it, aftermarket FI engines are just TROUBLE.

Not saying I wouldn't consider an MZ4 that's supercharged. I just wouldn't consider one that I don't know the history of.
__________________
Sitting on a beat-up office chair in front of a 5 year old computer in a basement floor, sipping on stale coffee watching a bunch of meaningless numbers scrolling aimlessly on a dimly lit 19” monitor.
Appreciate 0
      08-11-2014, 01:32 PM   #17
R0ME0
"The Midas Touch"
R0ME0's Avatar
519
Rep
1,055
Posts

Drives: F87 LBB ///M2
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA

iTrader: (14)

Garage List
2017 M2  [10.00]
2008 Z4M - SOLD  [0.00]
If you're gonna go with the Z4M at 50K make sure S2 has been done (~$1500-$2000 job)! The dealer never did it when I picked mine up and lied about when it needed to be done. My bad for not doing better homework. But honestly you'll be happy with both can't go wrong. Inline 6 Raw NA power or the N54/N55 with some bolt ons are a blast! Finding a 35iSdrive in Manual though thats a chore!
Appreciate 0
      08-11-2014, 02:39 PM   #18
KevinM
Brigadier General
KevinM's Avatar
2936
Rep
3,286
Posts

Drives: 2002 M5;2007 M Coupe;2020 M2C
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tucson

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2020 M2 Competition  [10.00]
2007 E86 M coupe  [8.38]
2002 E39 M5  [9.00]
The sDrive35is is not available with a manual - game, set, match for the MZ4C. The 35i is available (I think) with a manual. But if you've not driven both, one drive will tell you which one you want. I have never driven two cars that are similar in size and shape that have such different operating characteristics and feel.
__________________
2020 F87 M2C Hockenheim Silver/MT
2002 E39 M5 Sterling Gray/Caramel
2007 E86 Z4M Coupe Silver Gray/Black
2021 Kia Telluride (hauler)
Appreciate 0
      08-11-2014, 02:40 PM   #19
chickdr
Lieutenant Colonel
140
Rep
1,990
Posts

Drives: 2006 M Roadster
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buford, GA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by R0ME0 View Post
If you're gonna go with the Z4M at 50K make sure S2 has been done (~$1500-$2000 job)! The dealer never did it when I picked mine up and lied about when it needed to be done. My bad for not doing better homework. But honestly you'll be happy with both can't go wrong. Inline 6 Raw NA power or the N54/N55 with some bolt ons are a blast! Finding a 35iSdrive in Manual though thats a chore!
Yes, an impossible one!
Appreciate 0
      08-11-2014, 11:02 PM   #20
Spaceman Spiff
Captain
86
Rep
847
Posts

Drives: R8, 996 C2, Z4MR (sold)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SF Bay

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chickdr View Post
The thing is it appears you currently have a 2.5i motor right? Going to the stock 3.2 M motor will be a HUGE boost in performance. Heck, a 3.0si would be a massive gain on its own over the 2.5. I assume you have driven an M to compare with your car?
I have and it was great! It is definitely a huge step above my 2.5 but that supercharger sounds so tempting!

Yet it seems like I'll be getting a stock one, given all the input from everyone here. Going to check one out this week. It's a 2006 roadster with 30K miles which is lower than everything else I have seen. Wish me luck!
Appreciate 0
      08-12-2014, 01:16 PM   #21
chickdr
Lieutenant Colonel
140
Rep
1,990
Posts

Drives: 2006 M Roadster
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buford, GA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff View Post
I have and it was great! It is definitely a huge step above my 2.5 but that supercharger sounds so tempting!

Yet it seems like I'll be getting a stock one, given all the input from everyone here. Going to check one out this week. It's a 2006 roadster with 30K miles which is lower than everything else I have seen. Wish me luck!
It is an '06 M roadster? Best of luck.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 AM.




zpost
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST