|
|
SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
View Poll Results: Which FCAB would you be interested in | |||
Aluminum press in with nylon insert. | 2 | 15.38% | |
Aluminum press in with spherical bearing. | 3 | 23.08% | |
New housing with nylon insert. | 4 | 30.77% | |
New housing with spherical bearing. | 3 | 23.08% | |
I don't want a solid FCAB, I want poly... | 1 | 7.69% | |
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
04-02-2013, 11:55 PM | #1 |
Brigadier General
218
Rep 4,726
Posts |
Solid FCABs for offset cars, for real.
I have gone to do this once before but didn't have the resources at the time. Now it's pretty easy for me to do and I have been planning on making some for a while. I have several different designs all with different pros and cons as well as ultimate prices.
Press in aluminum bushing with nylon insert ~$100 Press in aluminum bushing with spherical bearing ~$200 (high grade bearings are ~$50 each x2) New housing with nylon insert ~$200 New housing with spherical bearings ~$300 The press in aluminum bushing would press into the factory housing. I don't like this so much since I think the arm should be centered in the housing if it can be (CNCing new housing would allow this) but it's the most economical solution. The nylon allows the arm to still rotate (which is necessary) but it's not the beefiest material for the job and a spherical bearing is much better built and suited, but that is obviously reflected in the price. CNCing a new housing all together would allow for the arm to be centered which is better as you don't have any load trying to rotate the bushing in the housing. (it would still be in the "offset" location, just centered in the new housing) This is a better design, but again, reflected in the price and not entirely necessary. I would like to see if people would be interested in group buying these without seeing them on a car first, wanting to see them on my car first would increase costs by about $50 each. A run of at least 10 would be necessary. If there is a consensus on what kind of bushing would be preferred I can go into more detail and show renderings.
__________________
|
04-03-2013, 02:52 AM | #2 |
Captain
58
Rep 912
Posts |
I am interested in such a development, however before voting, i would like to understand something.
When you say nylon insert, do you mean a urethane bushing? What is the life of a spherical bearing that is supposed to see high stresses from being solid? |
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2013, 05:06 AM | #3 |
Lieutenant General
2432
Rep 11,667
Posts |
JMO but I really don't see much demand for this when offset poly is already available.
__________________
'21 M2C Hockenheim Silver
'18 718 Cayman S Lava Orange (sold) '13 E92 M3 Santorini Blue (sold) '07 Z4 M Coupe Alpine White (sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2013, 09:18 AM | #4 | ||
Brigadier General
218
Rep 4,726
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
However, there is a huge difference between solid and poly. That bushing is basically an OEM bushing with a longer service life. It won't provide the performance of a solid bushing. Additionally, that design is a pressed in sleeve with no retention that is than bonded to urethane. That is a weak design and subject to failing, it probably has a low failure rate, but it should have been designed better to begin with.
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2013, 10:17 AM | #5 |
Captain
58
Rep 912
Posts |
mmm, How would a solid FCAB behave on the street. let's say a bumpy street with uneven and broken pavement?
Would it upset the car? i currently upgraded the coils of the KW V3 to the clubsport coils and i think a solid FCAB would go great with the upgrade. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2013, 01:32 PM | #6 |
Brigadier General
218
Rep 4,726
Posts |
It will not "upset" the car, it makes it more responsive. There can be an increase in harshness though if that's what you mean.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2013, 06:06 AM | #7 |
Enlisted Member
0
Rep 46
Posts |
I built a set of solid aluminum bushings with spherical bearings about 12 years ago for my 2002 GTI. The bushing wasn't offset... I actually cut and rewelded the steel a-arm to move the outer lower ball joint out a half inch (making front track 1" wider and stiffer in roll) and a half inch forward (about 4 degrees more camber from the as built 0 degrees). Moving the outer ball joint would have a similar effect as the offset bearing.
The effect on the GTI was significant. But that was a much more compliant (soft/quiet) car. If you watch a MkIV GTI go thru a corner at race speed you can actually see the laden front wheel move fore and aft 4-5 inches total and moving sharply rearward during breaking. Basically when the wheel moves that much your suspension settings go out the window because your caster is varying by probably 10 degrees if not more. Obviously, the M is a much more rigid car to begin with and not as effected but I'm sharing my experience. Since I dramatically changed the front geometry and bushing stiffness in one step it was a hard to say which change was more effective but the steering really came alive and had much more feed back and linear feel. It was easier to load the front end in corners and total grip was improved. On a timed skid pad at an scca test and tune with DOT race tires i took lateral grip from .98 to 1.05 (also remember the 1" track width is like adding roll bar in the front). As for noise, vibration and harshness there was very little difference on the GTI install. Vertical hits like potholes are transferred up into the shock not really laterally into the a-arm. The spherical is more likely to transfer vibrations from coarse roads creating "road noise" in the cabin but the effect on the more isolated and insulated GTI was minimal. With this said, I'll admit to only having a stock suspended M Coupe for a month and haven't experimented with it yet. http://www.flickr.com/photos/noassmb...ed/8619177288/ Last edited by Gallardo Rosso; 04-04-2013 at 06:14 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2013, 01:03 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant Colonel
80
Rep 1,663
Posts |
I'm somewhat interested, but it's really hard to tell what to expect. I tried searching on the M3 forums for similar solutions, and people report either no increase in NVH, or horrible noise (for the same products even).
For the spherical bearings in a new housing, would there be an expected increase in noise? How often would these have to be replaced compared to OEM? Do they require any kind of servicing? Will dirt or other contaminants negatively affect more than stock?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2013, 02:31 AM | #10 |
Captain
58
Rep 912
Posts |
I'm also in. voted.
EDIT: i voted for New housing with spherical bearing. i think that this solution would be the best, especially that the steering in our cars can be worked on quite a bit. with the spherical bearing, i expect to see a steering feel similar to E92 M3 GTS feel. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2013, 10:12 AM | #11 | ||
Brigadier General
218
Rep 4,726
Posts |
Quote:
There is an increase in NVH with any solid design, the problem is what a lot of people consider to be "horrible" is very different. I personally think it's barely noticeable, but I regularly increase the NVH in my cars in trade for performance. As the OEM is a rubber bushing, dirt and contaminant will impact ANY other design more. The spherical bearings would be serviceable and replaceable. They would not require servicing unless they went bad. Quote:
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2013, 12:34 PM | #12 |
Lieutenant Colonel
80
Rep 1,663
Posts |
If it's barely noticeable I'm in. Worst case I'll sell it back on here to someone else if I hate it. Voted for housing + spherical. Only the best for my Z
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2013, 02:16 PM | #13 |
Dog Listener
704
Rep 7,850
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2013, 02:52 PM | #14 | |
Captain
58
Rep 912
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-11-2013, 02:00 PM | #15 |
Brigadier General
218
Rep 4,726
Posts |
Alright, so I CADed the designs out using the actual dimensions and unfortunately one of my fears came true. There is simply no way to fit a spherical bearing into the design. There is not enough clearance between the control arm and the frame.
Even if I had the inner race of the bearing machined to function as the race and sleeve as one (HUGE money) and machined an entire new housing, it would still be about 1/4" too large. I believe I am just going to proceed with the simplest design being the pressed in aluminum spacer with nylon sleeve.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-23-2013, 07:26 PM | #16 |
Brigadier General
218
Rep 4,726
Posts |
I need some more input guys. Current issue I am fighting with is the press fit of the bushing. The clearances to press fit metal are very tight, if I machine the bushing to the proper press of around 66mm +3 thousandths, some people might not be able to press it in. The housing gets galled up some when removing the stock bushing.
The solution that will work universally is not doing a full press fit, and using loctite retention compound. It's an adhesive made specifically for this purpose. It will fill a few thousandths of clearance and hold very strongly, stronger than a press fit even would have. It will also eliminate any worry of the bushing rotating in the housing.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|