ZPOST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   ZPOST > BMW Z4 Technical Talk > Engine, Exhaust, Drivetrain Modifications
  TireRack

SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS!
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      09-08-2013, 06:21 PM   #1
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
VF Engineering supercharger kit - Z4 3.0i Full Review

Compilation:



Acceleration:





Highway, 3rd gear (prior to the retune... the car no longer puffs smoke):



On the dyno, where the car made 285 whp with the old (rich) tune and stock flywheel/clutch:



Supersprint Race Exhaust:



Supersprint headers added:



Update 9/10/2013: Rev, Parking Speed, Launch (stock headers/gearing)



Update 9/14/2013: Driver's perspective (stock headers/gearing)



Pros: Intoxicating sound. Where a new Altima poses a serious challenge to a stock Z4 in a stoplight battle, this kit will give your base car the power to leave anything on the road short of dedicated sports and muscle cars. It bestows the grunt to go with the Z4’s looks.

Cons: Installation nightmare for first timers. Little tech support. Several issues that I still need worked out. (Edit 10/3/2014: All issues sorted).

Grade: C- (Edit 6/8/2014: kinks worked out, B)

This is a great mod if you realize what it doesn’t do to a Z4 – turn it into a Z4M. The two are totally different cars with separate purposes. I suppose they look the same; are similarly quick in a straight line; and they share some parts and a badge. But that’s where the similarities end.

Consider the following facts:

1. A modified car will never be as smooth or run with as few quirks as a car that’s totally OEM, especially when it comes to a BMW.

2. Mods always look better in the book than on the car.

3. Allotting the funds to purchase a mod is only a third of the experience. You still need to deal with installation itself, including unexpected expenses relating to the install. The car may be down for long periods. It’s common practice to multiply the expected downtime by three to five in order to get a realistic estimate.

4. The Z4 is a low production car which shares many parts with the E46 3 series. Major modifications are often adapted from the vendor’s E46 catalog. Don’t be surprised if your application doesn’t garner the same attention from tech support. Businesses exist to make money. They devote time where they will net the greatest return.

To decide if this mod is worth further investigation – and this review worth reading – ask yourself the following questions:

1. Do you love your standard Z4 as-is, but long for more power?

2. Is your car in good condition? Are you sure the miles have accumulated abuse-free, and do you know what maintenance has been performed?

3. Do you have access to a shop that has successfully completed a supercharger install on an E46 or E85 before? Whether you plan to do the install yourself or through someone else, it’s always important to have an expert available that has done an install before. If not, you will be billed for the shop’s education. You’ll spend a lot of time beating yourself up, staring at the depreciating eye candy immobilized in your driveway.

4. Is the Z4 a second car? Never modify your daily driver.

5. Do you plan to sell your car in the next five years? Don’t spend the money if you expect to sell.

6. Do you ever want to track the car more than a couple days a year? I would not drive an M54B30-equipped car on the track due to the oil pump nut issue prevalent on the E46 forums. The E85 is too low volume to have had the problem raise its head on here. A Google search will net all kinds of info.

I say the above to set reasonable expectations for this modification and ensure an honest review. That said, forced induction is the only power mod that will put the car in a different league. You gotta pay to play.


Background

One thing that annoys me about the stock Z4 is that it looks faster than it really is, and every Road and Track reader with a 260+ horsepower family car or turbo diesel truck tries to rub it in. I enjoyed my car when it was stock, and the obnoxious attempts to get me to engage in a contest of acceleration never kept me up at night. But, there was always that secret, nagging desire to have the power to immediately put challengers in their place. I don’t condone street racing, but let’s be honest – it’s satisfying to live up to the “sleeper” name when it poses no danger to the public… or hop in front of that slow-mover in the left lane that’s rapidly trying to close the gap when they see you move to pass. We all have an inner child.

Still, that’s not why I pursued this mod.

The real reasons I did it were as an exploration in engineering and a challenge to myself. I discovered how overbuilt the M54B30 is, and it has so much potential it isn’t utilizing. I wanted to exploit it.

I wasn’t planning on going FI until the VF kits came out, on sale for 25% off. My non-M had been sitting more than it should have been, because I drove the M every time I had the choice. Actually, the only time I drove the non-M was when I felt guilty because I’d been putting so many miles on the M. A sports car that just sits is useless, so I justified buying the kit because it would give the car similar performance to the M but with a totally different feel. I’m about 95% satisfied with the final result. The road to get there was long and difficult.


Installation

After buying the kit, there were delays in it shipping. This is common, and not just for VF. Every time I’ve ordered a major modification for the car there has been a delay, whether it’s through G-Power, Supersprint, or VF. I had the kit shipped to my parents’ house (450 miles away, bad idea) because I could muster more help from interested parties there, and I had more access to tools and workspace. The installation instructions said 8 hours start to finish, so with several of us working, I figured it would take a weekend or two. It ended up taking five.

The biggest issue I’ve had with the whole experience has been the installation instructions. The instructions included with the kit were for a Z3 with the Vortech V2 blower. The Z4 is different in that there’s no power steering lines to modify, and the V3 unit has a self-contained oiling system. For someone who has never installed a VF kit before (or any other for that matter), trying to figure out which steps to omit was a pain. There was a lot of backtracking, reading ahead, and “making sure I’m sure” before proceeding. Why, after paying thousands of dollars for a kit, was I having to waste brainpower and interpret my next step from instructions that weren’t even for the right car or supercharger? I know VF had at least one Z4 that came to them for test fitting… why not take some pictures during the install process and spend a few hours on some new instructions?

The instructions came on a CD, and while it’s nice to have an electronic copy, a hard copy should have been included too. Otherwise you’ll either have to print your own or drag computer cables out to the garage.

Many of the hoses weren’t the correct length, which required trimming on the customer’s part. I modified several of the included hoses, and others required the customer to cut half of an old hose and attach the other half of a new one to it. One came into contact with the serpentine belt when fitted, so I bought a new one from the auto parts store. While not a huge deal, it’s the attention to detail that shines through. A quality kit would have included new hoses of the correct length, which I guess would cost more. You get what you pay for - there were a lot of things that were left to the customer that shouldn’t have been.

Another example is the MAF sensor extension - I had to cut off the MAF sensor and extend the wiring. A better way to do it would be a plug and play solution, rather than having the customer cut the OEM wiring and solder/heat shrink wires. I can solder, but I really wasn’t comfortable cutting off my old MAF sensor when a simple connector would have done the trick.


Troubleshooting

I ran into some other issues that were due to my own inexperience. When I first fired up the car, it idled erratically. After troubleshooting and a few emails to VF, I figured out that the MAF sensor’s orientation wasn’t correct. Which brings up another point – tech support was very slow to get back to me, and they answered about every third email I sent their way. So, if you run into an issue, expect a week or two delay in getting a response. I relied heavily on the forums.

Anyway, I ended up isolating it as the MAF sensor by unplugging the MAF. This put the car in speed density mode, which will get you home, but isn’t meant for long-term driving. In fact, it takes several tries to start the car, and you have to let it idle for at least 15 minutes before driving it. Otherwise it will stall. I oriented the MAF correctly, and the issue disappeared.

Once the MAF issue was sorted, the car ALMOST made it out of the driveway before the radiator drain plug fired out from the bottom of the car. Again, this was my own doing – I had stripped it when I removed it. Because the dealership is closed on the weekends, I had to order a new one to be shipped in… and wait another weekend and 900 mile round trip…

After replacing the drain plug, the car began to overheat. I always shut the car down as soon as I saw the temperature rise, and never had any warning lights illuminate. Based on VF’s recommendation, I decided to replace the thermostat since it was at about the mileage where they fail. This was a misdiagnosis, but I don’t regret replacing it. A thermostat should fail in the open position, and the car will just take longer to warm up. My symptoms were from air in the lines. I had read that the system is self-venting. Maybe it is, but you should ALWAYS vent air from the lines any time you mess with the cooling system.

After purging all air from the lines, I drove the car around a bit and noticed a leak when I checked fluid levels again. The leak was due to the included radiator hose being too long, which I cut too short. I made the mistake of driving with the radiator cowl off the car as I was sorting through all the issues. The lateral movement of the radiator stretched the hose and caused the leaks. A new hose from Autozone and buttoning down of the radiator cowl solved this issue.

I finally gained enough confidence in the car to drive it home. On the last 100 miles of the trip, the throttle response didn't feel right. In the last 20 miles, I knew something was definitely wrong. I coasted home at low rpm and popped the hood. One of the hoses connected to the intake manifold had completely detached, causing a major boost leak. When I originally installed the band clamps, I tightened them down to what I thought was “about right” since it’s very possible to break things by over-torqueing them. As almost anyone who has installed a FI kit before will tell you, too tight is just right. After tightening down everything, the car drove great.

In the next few weeks I put about 1000 miles on the kit, including a spirited run with our local CCA chapter. The spirited run was the culmination; I progressively built up to it, pushing the car more and more until I was confident it wouldn’t blow up spectacularly. If you install a new kit, every time you drive the car your senses are on full alert. Any sight, smell, sound, or feeling that just isn’t right will cause you to pull over and check everything.

All was going great, and I left for two weeks on leave prior to flying out for Afghanistan. When I returned, the car idled erratically. I unplugged the MAF, and sure enough the idle smoothed out. I swapped in a buddy’s MAF sensor from his 330ci, and isolated the issue to a failed MAF.

The moral here is, expect to spend some time troubleshooting and lose a few years off your life worrying about your car. There were days that I looked depressingly on a car that ran perfectly fine before I started screwing with it, and the only way it was going to run again was if I sorted out the god**** mess I created. Realize that the initial price of entry doesn’t include a lot of things you’ll need or want – gauges, a pod, supercharger maintenance items, general wear items, things broken during the install process, and so on.

The car still has a few issues, including some mild oscillations that surface on very rare occasions (once or twice a week) at part throttle, and a check engine light from it running rich. The CEL takes a couple hundred miles to surface after a reset. I haven’t hooked up my AFR gauge because I’ve run into issues with installing the pod, and I want to do it simultaneously with my Supersprint header install since they already have additional O2 sensor bungs built in. Despite checking and double checking everything, I haven’t found a mechanical issue that would cause the car to run rich. My next step is to take it to a quality shop to see what they say, because I’ve had a few places around here look it over, unable to provide any suggestions. (Edit 6/8/2014: VF has sent me a new tune, which I will test out over the next few weeks. Most of my issues have been sorted, so hopefully this tune will be the final piece! The car put down 285 rwhp with the previous tune and Supersprint headers. I'm expecting a few more horsepower since AFR will be optimized. VF has since updated the instructions and tune, as well as calling me to make sure everything was good to go. I will revise the kit's rating to a "B".)


Driving Impressions

The powerband is extremely peaky. The car feels stock up until 4000 rpm, and even then it’s only mildly quicker. After 5000 rpm, power ramps up and the car starts to push you back in the seat. 6k rpm to 7k rpm usually provokes language I won’t post here. I’ve seen enough dynos to know that a centrifugally supercharged car’s horsepower output is essentially a straight line up to redline. With this car, it feels more exponential. It’s like wow… woah… WOAH!! (Edit 10/3/2014: Now that the tune has been sorted out, the car feels exactly like the dyno shows... power builds progressively until redline).

The best part of the kit is the sound. A sports car simply isn’t a sports car without an exotic song. It’s not obnoxious but it turns heads, more so than my supercharged M. From the driver’s seat, the Vortech brings with it two new sounds. The first is the familiar belt-driven supercharger whine. It’s very faint, but you can hear it over the race exhaust. It's also very different from roots or twin screw whine! Its pitch increases with rpm, and it's highly desirable. The second new sound is the hiss of boost. It obviously builds with rpm, and at redline it overpowers the engine’s scream. At full throttle, the car sounds like a jet.

From outside the car, the whine is more noticeable. You can hear it echo off buildings at low speeds. Even non-enthusiasts know the car is modified. As previously stated, my goal was never to grab attention, but the overwhelming number of compliments from strangers is definitely a perk. With the M54 being such a quiet engine, the supercharger defines the car.



Conclusion

With the issues that I’m still sorting through, and the long road to get to this point, it’s hard for me to say whether I would do it again. (Edit 10/3/2014: I would absolutely do this mod again, though I would have it done at a shop). If I didn’t have the desire for the education motivating me, I would have had everything done at a shop I trust. When you add everything up, it would have been cheaper. Not to mention less painful. Living where I do, this isn’t a simple task.

I think an M has more midrange, and could probably beat a car with a VF kit off the line assuming equal drivers. (Edit 6/8/2014: A 3.0i with this kit CAN beat a stock Z4M in top end. With headers, it's no contest). But that doesn’t really mean anything except to people looking to brag. A car with this kit will always grab more positive attention if that's what you're after.

At this point I haven’t decided if I will upgrade the kit to a custom 11 psi “stage 2” with an intercooler and WMI; or sell the kit and go for an Active Autowerkes Stage 2, Technique Tuning Turbo, or ESS TS2. (Edit 6/8/2014: I plan to keep the car as-is, having paired it with headers, full exhaust, 3.64 final drive, and a lightweight flywheel/clutch combo... I may add WMI and cams later; it feels like it has over 400 bhp). For those that love their cars but long for more power, and have access to a good shop that can avoid or sort through issues, this kit is a great way to go.
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo

Last edited by pokeybritches; 10-12-2014 at 04:35 PM..
Appreciate 1
Vanne1590.00
      09-08-2013, 06:42 PM   #2
Steeler
Colonel
Steeler's Avatar
2422
Rep
2,697
Posts

Drives: Built not Bought 04 Z4 VF
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kitchener Ontario Canada

iTrader: (2)

Great write up Pokey.
I had my gremlins too with the install and inevitable sorting of issues but now enjoy the extra power.
The sound is intoxicating with even a stock exhaust.
I will be changing the exhaust over the winter along with a 3.46 rear gear set and fixing a nagging Vanos issue, but the car is a joy to drive.

Dave.
__________________
W2A Intercooled Vortech V3Si, custom ducting, Alpha N, 60# Bosch,2.62 pulley, multi port WMI, Severn Tuning(pokeybritches), Tial, magnaflow,SS race muffler, 42 design,3.91LSD, H&R, Hotchkis,ST coils,Konis, Megan camber arms, AKG SS, Nylon mounts, Poly bushings, Carbon interior, CF Aero.APEX
Appreciate 0
      09-08-2013, 07:02 PM   #3
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
Dave,

Thanks for help you provided me along the way! You're definitely right about the sound and power. I think my next mods will be the installation of the headers and gauges I have sitting here, followed by a 3.64 diff I've had in storage for the past two years... so I'm not that far behind you!
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      09-08-2013, 07:05 PM   #4
psygnosis
Major
psygnosis's Avatar
23
Rep
1,034
Posts

Drives: '04 Z4 3.0i Sport
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: WA

iTrader: (0)

The ultimate goal for my car is a supercharger someday maybe, but I was wondering, what made the two of you choose the VF setup over ESS?
__________________
Straightaways are for fast cars, Corners are for fast drivers.
Appreciate 0
      09-08-2013, 07:23 PM   #5
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
Price, sound, and power delivery. I haven't had much experience with the roots or twin screw superchargers in person, but based on everything I had read and what I could find on Youtube, I'm not a fan of the mmmeeeeeeeEEEEEEEE sound that seem to come from those types of blowers. The Vortech sounds more like a turbo, except an octave lower. Sound is more important to me than numbers, much like a Ferrari F40 isn't that impressive by today's standards but I'd kill to have one.

I initially liked that the Vortech didn't generate boost down low, so it isn't any harder on the car around town. In a full on race, you're going to be at high rpm where a centrifugal supercharger is more efficient than any other type of supercharger. It's the best of both worlds... or the worst of both worlds because you have "lag" (not really) and supercharger drag. Having seen what an ASA centrifugal blower will do, which has an impeller design that promotes a strong midrange... and is perfectly sized for the application versus the Vortech which is oversized... I've come to realize how much I want more midrange for daily driving. The M54 doesn't like hanging out at 6000 rpm + all the time, though issues with the oil pump nut seem to happen mainly with track cars. Basically, you have to rev the crap out of the car for it to be fast, but if you don't do it all the time then this setup is much easier on the car and almost as fast when really trying to get somewhere.
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      09-08-2013, 09:11 PM   #6
ZStig
instagram 997turbotom
279
Rep
7,376
Posts

Drives: Interlagos Z4MR
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Delray Beach, FL

iTrader: (4)

I'm still trying to wrap my head around the fact that you have 2 supercharged Z4s. hahaha
__________________
Appreciate 0
      09-09-2013, 08:01 AM   #7
Steeler
Colonel
Steeler's Avatar
2422
Rep
2,697
Posts

Drives: Built not Bought 04 Z4 VF
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kitchener Ontario Canada

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by psygnosis View Post
The ultimate goal for my car is a supercharger someday maybe, but I was wondering, what made the two of you choose the VF setup over ESS?
Definitely price was the determining factor for me.
Along with the fact I could not get any response from anyone up here in Canada on the ESS kit.

I did get surprisingly good response via email on the after sales service from VF.

As Josh said you do need to back track quite often during the installation and be prepared to buy a few more bits as well as modify some of the plumbing as it is not a plug and play kit, but the results are very satisfying

Dave
__________________
W2A Intercooled Vortech V3Si, custom ducting, Alpha N, 60# Bosch,2.62 pulley, multi port WMI, Severn Tuning(pokeybritches), Tial, magnaflow,SS race muffler, 42 design,3.91LSD, H&R, Hotchkis,ST coils,Konis, Megan camber arms, AKG SS, Nylon mounts, Poly bushings, Carbon interior, CF Aero.APEX
Appreciate 0
      09-10-2013, 10:51 PM   #8
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
Updated with rev, parking speed, launch video:

__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      09-11-2013, 12:33 AM   #9
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZStig View Post
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the fact that you have 2 supercharged Z4s. hahaha
Neither can anyone at work. It's like my defining feature. "Two identical cars, like a Russian Tsar"...

Apparently you need three to qualify as a connoisseur.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbarton62 View Post
Definitely price was the determining factor for me.
Along with the fact I could not get any response from anyone up here in Canada on the ESS kit.

I did get surprisingly good response via email on the after sales service from VF.

As Josh said you do need to back track quite often during the installation and be prepared to buy a few more bits as well as modify some of the plumbing as it is not a plug and play kit, but the results are very satisfying

Dave
I also got a great response from the sales department at VF, even before they had released a kit. I expressed my interest, and they responded within 24 hours... every time. This led me to believe that tech support would be the same, but it's not. In their defense, tech support did send me a very long and detailed email discussing potential causes for my early issues, but only after I complained on the forums. I was able to use that email to figure things out, and I really wish some of that info had been included in the kit's instructions.

When you're a company dealing with someone thousands of miles away, trying to install one of your kits for the first time, who is not a mechanic, and who has run into issues... I can't see it as an easy job to diagnose what the customer messed up, remotely. However, the instructions could have been a lot better and more thorough, or at least have tech support respond in a timely manner. I don't go away... I just get more obnoxious in my attempts to get an answer.

Dave - which exhaust setup are you considering? The Magnaflows?
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      09-14-2013, 10:39 AM   #10
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
Added a video from the driver's perspective. Sorry about the dust. The video was spur of the moment, and the car spends most of its life with the top down. A detail is coming soon.
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2013, 01:53 PM   #11
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
I had the rare opportunity to do a third gear pull against a mostly stock (Stromung exhaust only) Z4MC. The results were surprising.

Starting from ~65 mph, the Z4M immediately put a car length on my supercharged Z4, due to it having much better midrange. However, as the rpm climbed and boost built up, I clawed back the distance I was down and slowly pulled ahead. By the top of third and into some of fourth, I was about a car length ahead, and it probably would have stayed that way if we would have kept going.

I confirmed with the other driver that he didn't shift early. In fact he commented on how he heard me shift first. I would have to say that in a straight line from a dig, these cars would be about equal, depending on how long the race was. Due to the gear ratios being the way they are, and power delivery like it is, I think an M would have the advantage in the lower gears, and the supercharged Z4 is faster in the upper gears. Around town the M will be faster, because you have to have the rpm over 5k to make the supercharged Z go anywhere quickly. Once it's there, it has more top end than a Z4M.
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2013, 02:25 PM   #12
Beedub
Major General
United Kingdom
423
Rep
5,327
Posts

Drives: 2007 Z4 M roadster vt2-500
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

whats the power rating of the 3.0l s/C car???
i would have thought the stock ///M would be still be slightly quicker, id like to see a proper test of the said cars with a few different runs on a go pro...... not doubting you but id expect pretty even performance but to pull on a z4m you'd need more power.
how about some vids of an arranged run maybe starting from 40 maybe to give some different comparisons?
__________________
Z4MR VT2 - Clubsport build.
Multi award winning Detailing | Wrap | PPF specialists UK based - www.topwrapz.com
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2013, 04:03 PM   #13
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
I would have thought a stock Z4M was quicker too, and I even posted my thoughts on other forums... but it turned out to not be the case. The car is now in the shop getting a 3.64 diff and headers installed, so I can't do another "otherwise stock" comparison.

I also had the top down and the new diff in the passenger side floorboard. The only other power-adder mod I had for the run was a Supersprint race muffler and Y-pipe. I have Sportline CS.16's, though they probably had little impact.

I've seen 310 hp, 330 hp, and 280 whp all claimed as power levels. I guess the only way to really know is hit the dyno, but I doubt that will happen any time soon.
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2013, 04:17 PM   #14
Steenos
Lieutenant
United_States
56
Rep
588
Posts

Drives: 2007 Z4M Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Tennessee

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2021 BMW M240i  [0.00]
2007 M Coupe  [0.00]
Hey, I had to brake early for a car in front of me. Just sayin.
__________________
2021 m240i on order
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2013, 04:19 PM   #15
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steenos
Hey, I had to brake early for a car in front of me. Just sayin.
Hahaha you liar
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      11-29-2013, 10:37 PM   #16
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
I realized I never posted a dyno. 285 whp (345-350 bhp) with Supersprint headers, Y-pipe, and race exhaust. OEM "section 1" (S-pipe) resonator. The car is running very rich (10.2). VF got back to me right away when I pinged them for a retune, saying they had an update. When I purchase the cable (no shipping my ECU any more), I'll report back. I plan to have some Magnaflow 200 cell metallic cats welded in too.
Attached Images
 
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo

Last edited by pokeybritches; 06-08-2014 at 02:47 PM..
Appreciate 0
      11-29-2013, 10:39 PM   #17
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
One more thing - the guy that installed the headers also found a small boost leak. When I get cats installed and everything reset, I'll see if that's what caused the CEL.
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      12-20-2013, 08:42 PM   #18
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
Here's a quick rolling start 5-60 mph.

__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      06-08-2014, 02:38 PM   #19
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
Edit 6/8/2014: VF has sent me a new tune, which I will test out over the next few weeks. Most of my issues have been sorted, so hopefully this tune will be the final piece! The car put down 285 rwhp with the previous tune and Supersprint headers. I'm expecting a few more horsepower since AFR will be optimized. VF has since updated the instructions and tune, as well as calling me to make sure everything was good to go. I will revise the kit's rating to a "B".
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      06-08-2014, 04:50 PM   #20
Steeler
Colonel
Steeler's Avatar
2422
Rep
2,697
Posts

Drives: Built not Bought 04 Z4 VF
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kitchener Ontario Canada

iTrader: (2)

Looking forward to your review Josh
Waiting to send mine out for remapping once you report back
__________________
W2A Intercooled Vortech V3Si, custom ducting, Alpha N, 60# Bosch,2.62 pulley, multi port WMI, Severn Tuning(pokeybritches), Tial, magnaflow,SS race muffler, 42 design,3.91LSD, H&R, Hotchkis,ST coils,Konis, Megan camber arms, AKG SS, Nylon mounts, Poly bushings, Carbon interior, CF Aero.APEX
Appreciate 0
      10-03-2014, 03:09 PM   #21
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
I was messing around on youtube earlier and came across an E46 Technique Tuning stage 1 turbo video. The TT turbo seems to be the benchmark on the E46 forums, so I decided to see how it compares to my Z4 with full exhaust and modified gearing. It looks to be close from 30 mph - 85 mph, with the TT turbo maybe a tick faster. I would put my money on the Z4 off the line due to the lighter weight and my LTW flywheel combo. The E46 appears to have stock gearing, so it will have a better top speed and get better gas mileage. It's pretty interesting to see the two very different ways of making power - non-intercooled centrifugal supercharger and swapped final drive versus an intercooled turbo running more boost.

http://youtubedoubler.com/dyAX
__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
      10-06-2014, 08:45 PM   #22
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
Op tested my AFR gauge prior to finishing the pod install. AFR is high 11's / low 12's.

__________________


VF Engineering Z4 3.0i, ESS Z4M, G-Power Z4M, 996 Turbo
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 AM.




zpost
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST