ZPOST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   ZPOST > BMW Z4 Technical Talk > Engine, Exhaust, Drivetrain Modifications
  TireRack

SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS!
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      09-17-2010, 09:50 PM   #1
mfanatic325
///M-fanatic
mfanatic325's Avatar
Taiwan
193
Rep
3,885
Posts

Drives: '01 911 Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cupertino, CA.

iTrader: (23)

Z4MC Baseline Dyno

I finally had a chance to do my baseline dyno today. Just got the car a little less than 2 months ago. It's completely stock performance-wise. Though I did run the dynos without any muffler cannisters (I heard that may lose some power? )
The dynos were done on a DynaPack @ 6PM or so, when ambient temperatures were decently low, in the mid-60's or so. Pulls were done pretty much back to back, with less than a minute of break in between.
I did two pulls in 3rd gear, two pulls in 4th gear, and two pulls in 5th. The first pulls in each gear were done without Sport mode on, and second pulls in each gear were with Sport mode on (just for giggles). DSC off for all pulls of course. Will scan the dyno sheets and upload them later tonight.
Appreciate 0
      09-17-2010, 09:51 PM   #2
mfanatic325
///M-fanatic
mfanatic325's Avatar
Taiwan
193
Rep
3,885
Posts

Drives: '01 911 Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cupertino, CA.

iTrader: (23)

Here are the dyno graphs as promised...

3rd Gear Pulls:



4th Gear Pulls:



5th Gear Pulls:

Last edited by mfanatic325; 09-18-2010 at 01:17 AM..
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 01:18 AM   #3
mfanatic325
///M-fanatic
mfanatic325's Avatar
Taiwan
193
Rep
3,885
Posts

Drives: '01 911 Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cupertino, CA.

iTrader: (23)

Does anyone know why the higher gear pulls differ in peak power delivery? Shouldn't it be the same power delivery regardless of gear? This is where my noobness comes in
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 11:00 AM   #4
oj
New Member
oj's Avatar
0
Rep
29
Posts

Drives: 2007 Z4 M Coupe
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (0)

Gearing affects how much power is applied to the ground. Its been some yrs since I've dynoed cars but we were always told that we'd get the most accurate pulls by using a gear that's 1:1. For Z4Ms that's 5th gear. I'm sure someone can chime in if I'm wrong.
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 11:38 AM   #5
XMetal
Colonel
XMetal's Avatar
United_States
1128
Rep
2,863
Posts

Drives: Anything
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 Z4M Coupe  [10.00]
2018 Audi S3  [0.00]
2004 X5  [8.50]
Thanks for the interesting info. In regards to the graphs, which is which? Is the red plot for sport mode on or off?
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 06:34 PM   #6
mfanatic325
///M-fanatic
mfanatic325's Avatar
Taiwan
193
Rep
3,885
Posts

Drives: '01 911 Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cupertino, CA.

iTrader: (23)

Quote:
Originally Posted by oj View Post
Gearing affects how much power is applied to the ground. Its been some yrs since I've dynoed cars but we were always told that we'd get the most accurate pulls by using a gear that's 1:1. For Z4Ms that's 5th gear. I'm sure someone can chime in if I'm wrong.
Yeah, that's what my dyno guy told me too. So I actually tried 5th gear pulls first, but the #'s were WAY low. I was like wtf? This isn't right...cuz people are averaging 260-270rwhp stock...
So he had me try 4th, and the 3rd, and the #'s were better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by XMetal View Post
In regards to the graphs, which is which? Is the red plot for sport mode on or off?
As for the pulls differentiating sport mode on/off, I really don't remember and am not sure lol...
In any case, I honestly don't think the sport mode makes a difference in terms of peak power. It only affects throttle input, so in a real-life situation for example, you might end up going from 0-60 slightly sooner than without sport mode on, etc.

I'm assuming that since all of the graphs have a common green plot, that green = 1st run.
But the third graph has blue-colored plot instead of red, so I'm not sure if this assumption is valid.
Appreciate 0
      09-18-2010, 08:38 PM   #7
vachss
Captain
55
Rep
815
Posts

Drives: Z4 Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ventura County, CA

iTrader: (1)

Just for fun, here's a comparison with my weaker 3.0si motor - 52 whp less than the OP's Z4M at baseline and still 42 hp less after an OE Engineering tune.


Last edited by vachss; 09-18-2010 at 08:45 PM..
Appreciate 0
      09-19-2010, 03:05 AM   #8
mfanatic325
///M-fanatic
mfanatic325's Avatar
Taiwan
193
Rep
3,885
Posts

Drives: '01 911 Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cupertino, CA.

iTrader: (23)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shift@red View Post
For dyno's, it is recommended to use a 1:1 gear or as close as possible. The numbers dont look TOO bad. I think the avg for the Z4M seems to be in the 270s.
On a side note, my 2006 cayman S that was supposed to only have 295 crank hp actually put down close to 280 rwhp done stock and then just over 300 with secondary cat delete and race exhaust.
Did you get the SS xpipe? If so, throw that and the exhaust on and redyno. The x pipe and headers are where you are going to see exhaust system gains for this car. I would imagine youll see some good gains with both on.
The dyno was $100 for 6 pulls. A bit more expensive than I had originally planned. The same guy on the same dyno used to charge me $80 for the same amount of pulls. But this was for my MR2 turbo, which is he way more familiar with. It's @ an MR2 shop after all.
Anyhow, with $100 in mind, I might wait for another dyno lol..

Also, I haven't gotten the SS x-pipe yet. Can't install the SS mufflers until I figure out a solution for the section2/x-pipe since I need it to somehow mate up correctly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vachss View Post
Just for fun, here's a comparison with my weaker 3.0si motor - 52 whp less than the OP's Z4M at baseline and still 42 hp less after an OE Engineering tune.

Really? Only 52whp less from stock? Dang, that sure does kill my ego
Appreciate 0
      09-19-2010, 09:42 PM   #9
Trev
Private First Class
United_States
4
Rep
108
Posts

Drives: Z4MC
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland Oregon

iTrader: (0)

Out of interest did you have to put your car into a dyno mode?
Appreciate 0
      09-19-2010, 09:44 PM   #10
nesrevival
First Lieutenant
nesrevival's Avatar
28
Rep
392
Posts

Drives: Z4MC 07'
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CA

iTrader: (2)

my stock dyno was 24x whp zzz
__________________
2016 MK7 GTI PP LP DCC
2015 Macan Turbo Ordered!!!
http://www.porsche-code.com/PF1XIUS5
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gone: 2007 Supercharged ESS VT-525 Z4MC
Appreciate 0
      09-19-2010, 11:34 PM   #11
mfanatic325
///M-fanatic
mfanatic325's Avatar
Taiwan
193
Rep
3,885
Posts

Drives: '01 911 Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cupertino, CA.

iTrader: (23)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trev View Post
Out of interest did you have to put your car into a dyno mode?
No, no such mode was used. All I had to do was turn off DSC, otherwise the system tries to hit the brakes and goes nuts trying to correct the wheel spin.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2010, 10:23 PM   #12
Trev
Private First Class
United_States
4
Rep
108
Posts

Drives: Z4MC
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland Oregon

iTrader: (0)

Just dyno'd my bone stock 07 Z4 M, 7 pulls highest of 284whp lowest 278whp. Temp was pretty high for Portland @ 86F. To their credit they only charged me for 3 pulls $80.

Interesting fact the 1st three pulls we're with a ram air scoop fitted. Last three pulls we're with completely stock air scoop in place. Stock scoop was more consistent in achieving max hp & decreased an a/f lean condition right at the top end.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2010, 11:05 PM   #13
mfanatic325
///M-fanatic
mfanatic325's Avatar
Taiwan
193
Rep
3,885
Posts

Drives: '01 911 Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cupertino, CA.

iTrader: (23)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trev View Post
Just dyno'd my bone stock 07 Z4 M, 7 pulls highest of 284whp lowest 278whp. Temp was pretty high for Portland @ 86F. To their credit they only charged me for 3 pulls $80.

Interesting fact the 1st three pulls we're with a ram air scoop fitted. Last three pulls we're with completely stock air scoop in place. Stock scoop was more consistent in achieving max hp & decreased an a/f lean condition right at the top end.
Hmm interesting. What kind of dyno was it? I heard that the DynaPack that I use typically reads lower. Power was consistent with my other car as well.
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2010, 12:29 PM   #14
Trev
Private First Class
United_States
4
Rep
108
Posts

Drives: Z4MC
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland Oregon

iTrader: (0)

www.tunedbypsi.com have a slick setup using a all wheel drive 424xLC2 Dynojet.

Last edited by Trev; 02-23-2013 at 12:33 AM..
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2010, 03:20 PM   #15
mfanatic325
///M-fanatic
mfanatic325's Avatar
Taiwan
193
Rep
3,885
Posts

Drives: '01 911 Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cupertino, CA.

iTrader: (23)

Hmm I wonder if my recent valve adjustment during Inspection 1 would help my peak hp and tq any. The dynos I ran was before Inspection 1, which is why I ask.
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2010, 05:55 PM   #16
Caddyshk
M = Midlife Crisis
Caddyshk's Avatar
Canada
65
Rep
2,006
Posts

Drives: 2006 Z4MC Interlagos
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trev View Post
Just dyno'd my bone stock 07 Z4 M, 7 pulls highest of 284whp lowest 278whp. Temp was pretty high for Portland @ 86F. To their credit they only charged me for 3 pulls $80.

Interesting fact the 1st three pulls we're with a ram air scoop fitted. Last three pulls we're with completely stock air scoop in place. Stock scoop was more consistent in achieving max hp & decreased an a/f lean condition right at the top end.
More what I would expect - I believe the max I've seen posted stock was around 289-291.
__________________
2006 Z4MC - #LL93158
SS Race Cans, RE X Pipe, DKF Sec 1, Fabspeed Headers, OE STB, AS Shifter, Dave Z CDV, GC Coil Overs, Stoptech lines, Hawk DTC Pads, RE Clutch Stop, RE Transmission Mounts, Vibra-Technics Engine Mounts, Poly FCAB & RTAB, LeatherZ M Shift Boot, Tekarbon Rear Spoiler, CF Grills, Advan RS DGM
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2010, 06:05 PM   #17
mfanatic325
///M-fanatic
mfanatic325's Avatar
Taiwan
193
Rep
3,885
Posts

Drives: '01 911 Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cupertino, CA.

iTrader: (23)

hmm iono, that seems kind of high. The only other live (in-person) dyno of an S54 that I've seen was years ago when the E46 M3 first came out. And that was a mustang dyno I think. The #'s were about the same as mine, ~260/270 peak hp. Considering our S54's are supposedly ever so slightly weaker than the ones put in the E46 M3 in stock form, I think my #'s are about right. Heh, definitely not #'s I can really boast about, but humble ones I suppose.

My MR2 turbo, after all bolt-ons, a slightly larger turbo, and a tune was running peak 222rwhp and 213rwtq all at 16psi on the same dyno (with about 60 degree ambient temperature). Though I say that Dynapack reads slightly lower because there were may others with the same modifications I had on my MR2, but were getting closer to 250rwhp in their cars.
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2010, 07:39 PM   #18
Caddyshk
M = Midlife Crisis
Caddyshk's Avatar
Canada
65
Rep
2,006
Posts

Drives: 2006 Z4MC Interlagos
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada

iTrader: (0)

10-15% loss to crank - something is/was wrong with your car or the dyno...
__________________
2006 Z4MC - #LL93158
SS Race Cans, RE X Pipe, DKF Sec 1, Fabspeed Headers, OE STB, AS Shifter, Dave Z CDV, GC Coil Overs, Stoptech lines, Hawk DTC Pads, RE Clutch Stop, RE Transmission Mounts, Vibra-Technics Engine Mounts, Poly FCAB & RTAB, LeatherZ M Shift Boot, Tekarbon Rear Spoiler, CF Grills, Advan RS DGM
Appreciate 0
      09-29-2010, 04:05 PM   #19
mfanatic325
///M-fanatic
mfanatic325's Avatar
Taiwan
193
Rep
3,885
Posts

Drives: '01 911 Turbo
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cupertino, CA.

iTrader: (23)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caddyshk View Post
10-15% loss to crank - something is/was wrong with your car or the dyno...
You're referring to Trev's dynos right? Yeah I thought the same. Pretty high #'s for stock.
Appreciate 0
      09-29-2010, 06:55 PM   #20
Caddyshk
M = Midlife Crisis
Caddyshk's Avatar
Canada
65
Rep
2,006
Posts

Drives: 2006 Z4MC Interlagos
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shift@red View Post
On a BMW, its typically ~18-20%.

E46 M3, 333 crank, ~270 rwhp (18.9%)
Z4M, 330 crank, ~270 rwhp (18%)
E9X M3, 414 crank, ~330 rwhp (20%)
E60 M5, 500 crank, ~400 rwhp (20%)

Those are generally consistent numbers on said cars.
12% is typical... The Dyno's of plenty of these cars have been posted on other sites...
__________________
2006 Z4MC - #LL93158
SS Race Cans, RE X Pipe, DKF Sec 1, Fabspeed Headers, OE STB, AS Shifter, Dave Z CDV, GC Coil Overs, Stoptech lines, Hawk DTC Pads, RE Clutch Stop, RE Transmission Mounts, Vibra-Technics Engine Mounts, Poly FCAB & RTAB, LeatherZ M Shift Boot, Tekarbon Rear Spoiler, CF Grills, Advan RS DGM
Appreciate 0
      09-30-2010, 03:28 AM   #21
pokeybritches
Colonel
pokeybritches's Avatar
United_States
479
Rep
2,782
Posts

Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (12)

Garage List
2006 BMW Z4M  [10.00]
2006 BMW Z4M  [8.50]
2003 BMW Z4 3.0i  [9.00]
The standard Z4 has less power loss to the wheels because of the electric steering, but it's impossible to say exactly how much. All dynos are different and are really only useful in comparing different vehicles on the same dyno and under the same conditions, or a horsepower delta before and after mods.
Appreciate 0
      09-30-2010, 08:24 AM   #22
Shipkiller
Colonel
Shipkiller's Avatar
United_States
187
Rep
2,138
Posts

Drives: Me
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Virginia Beach

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokeybritches View Post
The standard Z4 has less power loss to the wheels because of the electric steering, but it's impossible to say exactly how much. All dynos are different and are really only useful in comparing different vehicles on the same dyno and under the same conditions, or a horsepower delta before and after mods.

Please explain how having electric steering effects drive train loss?
I would really like to know, just for my own education.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 PM.




zpost
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST