|
|
SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-17-2010, 09:50 PM | #1 |
///M-fanatic
193
Rep 3,885
Posts |
Z4MC Baseline Dyno
I finally had a chance to do my baseline dyno today. Just got the car a little less than 2 months ago. It's completely stock performance-wise. Though I did run the dynos without any muffler cannisters (I heard that may lose some power? )
The dynos were done on a DynaPack @ 6PM or so, when ambient temperatures were decently low, in the mid-60's or so. Pulls were done pretty much back to back, with less than a minute of break in between. I did two pulls in 3rd gear, two pulls in 4th gear, and two pulls in 5th. The first pulls in each gear were done without Sport mode on, and second pulls in each gear were with Sport mode on (just for giggles). DSC off for all pulls of course. Will scan the dyno sheets and upload them later tonight. |
09-18-2010, 01:18 AM | #3 |
///M-fanatic
193
Rep 3,885
Posts |
Does anyone know why the higher gear pulls differ in peak power delivery? Shouldn't it be the same power delivery regardless of gear? This is where my noobness comes in
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2010, 11:00 AM | #4 |
New Member
0
Rep 29
Posts |
Gearing affects how much power is applied to the ground. Its been some yrs since I've dynoed cars but we were always told that we'd get the most accurate pulls by using a gear that's 1:1. For Z4Ms that's 5th gear. I'm sure someone can chime in if I'm wrong.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2010, 11:38 AM | #5 |
Colonel
1128
Rep 2,863
Posts
Drives: Anything
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
|
Thanks for the interesting info. In regards to the graphs, which is which? Is the red plot for sport mode on or off?
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2010, 06:34 PM | #6 | ||
///M-fanatic
193
Rep 3,885
Posts |
Quote:
So he had me try 4th, and the 3rd, and the #'s were better. Quote:
In any case, I honestly don't think the sport mode makes a difference in terms of peak power. It only affects throttle input, so in a real-life situation for example, you might end up going from 0-60 slightly sooner than without sport mode on, etc. I'm assuming that since all of the graphs have a common green plot, that green = 1st run. But the third graph has blue-colored plot instead of red, so I'm not sure if this assumption is valid. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2010, 08:38 PM | #7 |
Captain
55
Rep 815
Posts |
Just for fun, here's a comparison with my weaker 3.0si motor - 52 whp less than the OP's Z4M at baseline and still 42 hp less after an OE Engineering tune.
Last edited by vachss; 09-18-2010 at 08:45 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-19-2010, 03:05 AM | #8 | |
///M-fanatic
193
Rep 3,885
Posts |
Quote:
Anyhow, with $100 in mind, I might wait for another dyno lol.. Also, I haven't gotten the SS x-pipe yet. Can't install the SS mufflers until I figure out a solution for the section2/x-pipe since I need it to somehow mate up correctly. Really? Only 52whp less from stock? Dang, that sure does kill my ego |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-19-2010, 09:44 PM | #10 |
First Lieutenant
28
Rep 392
Posts |
my stock dyno was 24x whp zzz
__________________
2016 MK7 GTI PP LP DCC
2015 Macan Turbo Ordered!!! http://www.porsche-code.com/PF1XIUS5 ----------------------------------------------------------- Gone: 2007 Supercharged ESS VT-525 Z4MC |
Appreciate
0
|
09-19-2010, 11:34 PM | #11 |
///M-fanatic
193
Rep 3,885
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2010, 10:23 PM | #12 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 108
Posts |
Just dyno'd my bone stock 07 Z4 M, 7 pulls highest of 284whp lowest 278whp. Temp was pretty high for Portland @ 86F. To their credit they only charged me for 3 pulls $80.
Interesting fact the 1st three pulls we're with a ram air scoop fitted. Last three pulls we're with completely stock air scoop in place. Stock scoop was more consistent in achieving max hp & decreased an a/f lean condition right at the top end. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2010, 11:05 PM | #13 | |
///M-fanatic
193
Rep 3,885
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2010, 12:29 PM | #14 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 108
Posts |
www.tunedbypsi.com have a slick setup using a all wheel drive 424xLC2 Dynojet.
Last edited by Trev; 02-23-2013 at 12:33 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2010, 03:20 PM | #15 |
///M-fanatic
193
Rep 3,885
Posts |
Hmm I wonder if my recent valve adjustment during Inspection 1 would help my peak hp and tq any. The dynos I ran was before Inspection 1, which is why I ask.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2010, 05:55 PM | #16 | |
M = Midlife Crisis
65
Rep 2,006
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2006 Z4MC - #LL93158
SS Race Cans, RE X Pipe, DKF Sec 1, Fabspeed Headers, OE STB, AS Shifter, Dave Z CDV, GC Coil Overs, Stoptech lines, Hawk DTC Pads, RE Clutch Stop, RE Transmission Mounts, Vibra-Technics Engine Mounts, Poly FCAB & RTAB, LeatherZ M Shift Boot, Tekarbon Rear Spoiler, CF Grills, Advan RS DGM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2010, 06:05 PM | #17 |
///M-fanatic
193
Rep 3,885
Posts |
hmm iono, that seems kind of high. The only other live (in-person) dyno of an S54 that I've seen was years ago when the E46 M3 first came out. And that was a mustang dyno I think. The #'s were about the same as mine, ~260/270 peak hp. Considering our S54's are supposedly ever so slightly weaker than the ones put in the E46 M3 in stock form, I think my #'s are about right. Heh, definitely not #'s I can really boast about, but humble ones I suppose.
My MR2 turbo, after all bolt-ons, a slightly larger turbo, and a tune was running peak 222rwhp and 213rwtq all at 16psi on the same dyno (with about 60 degree ambient temperature). Though I say that Dynapack reads slightly lower because there were may others with the same modifications I had on my MR2, but were getting closer to 250rwhp in their cars. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2010, 07:39 PM | #18 |
M = Midlife Crisis
65
Rep 2,006
Posts |
10-15% loss to crank - something is/was wrong with your car or the dyno...
__________________
2006 Z4MC - #LL93158
SS Race Cans, RE X Pipe, DKF Sec 1, Fabspeed Headers, OE STB, AS Shifter, Dave Z CDV, GC Coil Overs, Stoptech lines, Hawk DTC Pads, RE Clutch Stop, RE Transmission Mounts, Vibra-Technics Engine Mounts, Poly FCAB & RTAB, LeatherZ M Shift Boot, Tekarbon Rear Spoiler, CF Grills, Advan RS DGM |
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2010, 04:05 PM | #19 |
///M-fanatic
193
Rep 3,885
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2010, 06:55 PM | #20 |
M = Midlife Crisis
65
Rep 2,006
Posts |
12% is typical... The Dyno's of plenty of these cars have been posted on other sites...
__________________
2006 Z4MC - #LL93158
SS Race Cans, RE X Pipe, DKF Sec 1, Fabspeed Headers, OE STB, AS Shifter, Dave Z CDV, GC Coil Overs, Stoptech lines, Hawk DTC Pads, RE Clutch Stop, RE Transmission Mounts, Vibra-Technics Engine Mounts, Poly FCAB & RTAB, LeatherZ M Shift Boot, Tekarbon Rear Spoiler, CF Grills, Advan RS DGM |
Appreciate
0
|
09-30-2010, 03:28 AM | #21 |
Colonel
479
Rep 2,782
Posts
Drives: ESS/G-Power Z4M, VF Z4, 996tt
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles
|
The standard Z4 has less power loss to the wheels because of the electric steering, but it's impossible to say exactly how much. All dynos are different and are really only useful in comparing different vehicles on the same dyno and under the same conditions, or a horsepower delta before and after mods.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-30-2010, 08:24 AM | #22 | |
Colonel
187
Rep 2,138
Posts
Drives: Me
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
|
Quote:
Please explain how having electric steering effects drive train loss? I would really like to know, just for my own education. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|