View Single Post
      03-10-2019, 07:43 PM   #20
WeekendWarriorz
Captain
WeekendWarriorz's Avatar
674
Rep
757
Posts

Drives: 2006 Z4M
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael9218 View Post
So the only cons to this are the increase in fuel consumption of @25% due to the lower energy density of E85 compared to 93 octane E10 and for track use finding reliable E85 at or near the track?

The first con isn't a big deal as I'm only using less than half of a tank per session, but a quick check of my regular tracks doesn't look promising for availability.
The only "con" is the decreased fuel mileage. I was daily driving 2 years ago on full e85 and am right now. After calculating costs it's much cheaper for me to run full e85 as it's $2.49 (in the winter) and $2.20 (summer) per gallon compared to 91oct that's $3.50+. I get about 16mpg on full e85 in SoCal traffic. The % of ethanol at the pump doesn't matter, but most pumps will be around e75-e85, this will map fuel for any blend of ethanol.
__________________
2006 Z4 M Roadster Black/Imola Red, FBO VF-Engineering, e85 Flex Fuel-Sold
2012 BMW 135i N55 DCT Alpine White/Coral Red, FBO, TBI, Full e85, JB4 BEF-Sold
2006 Z4 M Roadster Black/Black-Sold
2021 M2 Competition DCT Hockenheim Silver
Appreciate 0